I'm not saying don't question him. I'm just asking if there's any point to keeping him alive for months upon months trying to milk every bit of intel from him.
Again, we really wouldn't know till afterward. He could by now be little more than a figurehead and senile for all we know, but even that tells us a lot. It's really just like a serial killer or mobster, the police have no idea what they are going to find out till they have them for interrogation. He probably knows a lot that will be useful even if a lot goes stale, a lot might serves as confirmation of this or that other piece of intel, he might just totally clam up or he might crack immediately or he might decide to rave and rant and spew info. Considering the cost and risk of keeping him a prisoner are both fairly negligible, we've nothing to lose and a lot to possibly gain by trying. Even if we don't get all medieval on him we're likely to be able to squeeze a lot of intel out of him, but it's likely a lot of times to be confirmation of other intel, elimination of others, etc. I'm not too sure what you're getting at, honestly. If we get him, milk him till his dry and execute him, seems pretty straight-forward, if he dies during capture or while imprisoned, well, good riddance to bad rubbish.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
AG Eric Holder evades questioning
- 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM
818 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights?
- 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM
592 Views
Why should location matter when dealing with a borderless threat like al-Qaeda? *NM*
- 17/03/2010 10:20:08 PM
226 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality?
- 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM
547 Views
Line 1
- 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM
729 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention.
- 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM
616 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game.
- 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
539 Views
Well, I guess it depends whether you want to try him, doesn't it?
- 19/03/2010 11:34:34 PM
518 Views
*shrugs*
- 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM
550 Views
That doesn't seem very logical
- 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM
635 Views
That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute)
- 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM
592 Views
It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM
505 Views
Re: It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM
610 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM*
- 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM
240 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure
- 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM
534 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys
- 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM
549 Views
I remember a little of that
- 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM
524 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress
- 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM
514 Views
Seems he could answer the question without evasion or producing a soundbite
- 18/03/2010 04:12:04 AM
586 Views
I don't think I agree with that.
- 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM
528 Views
Fair enough
- 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM
530 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect.
- 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
550 Views
do we know how much he actually knows?
- 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM
527 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM*
- 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM
226 Views
that was totally not my question
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
536 Views
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
536 Views
LOL, it wasn't exactly clear
- 19/03/2010 01:42:18 AM
522 Views
Most people include congressmen/women don't understand Miranda rights,most people don't know the Law
- 18/03/2010 02:08:10 AM
601 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering.
- 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM
598 Views
I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner.
- 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM
485 Views
