Active Users:340 Time:04/05/2024 10:05:28 PM
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music

This one, I don't quite follow.

Which I think is true of music in general; again, there may be cultural predispositions, but music doesn't come with a genotype. If it were strictly "black" music there are a lot of European countries where a jazz station wouldn't be economically viable.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
That's Before We Even Touch American Issues Like This:
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2583 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 632 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 659 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 777 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 718 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 647 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 735 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 583 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 538 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 601 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 374 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 625 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 765 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 555 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 600 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 635 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 626 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 355 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 360 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 338 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 630 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 631 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 792 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 629 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 866 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 579 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 591 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 624 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 720 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 799 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 946 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 618 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 647 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 855 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 589 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 654 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 666 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 712 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 739 Views

Reply to Message