Active Users:522 Time:01/07/2025 10:47:24 PM
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music

This one, I don't quite follow.

Which I think is true of music in general; again, there may be cultural predispositions, but music doesn't come with a genotype. If it were strictly "black" music there are a lot of European countries where a jazz station wouldn't be economically viable.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
That's Before We Even Touch American Issues Like This:
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2821 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 783 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 839 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 922 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 857 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 792 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 888 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 721 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 678 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 744 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 438 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 767 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 917 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 709 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 744 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 782 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 773 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 427 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 426 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 408 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 759 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 776 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 928 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 781 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 1020 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 733 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 733 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 777 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 872 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 987 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1101 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 771 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 802 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 1018 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 726 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 804 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 823 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 855 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 889 Views

Reply to Message