Active Users:686 Time:14/03/2026 11:14:39 PM
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music

This one, I don't quite follow.

Which I think is true of music in general; again, there may be cultural predispositions, but music doesn't come with a genotype. If it were strictly "black" music there are a lot of European countries where a jazz station wouldn't be economically viable.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
That's Before We Even Touch American Issues Like This:
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2971 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 873 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 932 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 1021 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 965 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 880 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 993 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 819 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 784 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 838 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 486 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 869 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 1017 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 822 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 857 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 877 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 883 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 467 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 470 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 451 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 847 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 866 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 1026 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 885 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 1125 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 825 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 843 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 871 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 972 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 1100 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1221 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 862 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 893 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 1121 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 824 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 911 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 920 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 945 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 984 Views

Reply to Message