Most people usually pronounce it one way or another, but rarely both ways.
A dog. Ay dog.
A dog. Uh dog.
You're just a freak.
I say "thuh" and "uh" almost all the time. Thinking on it, I may say "thee" apple, but I'm thinking I probably often don't.
I wish I usually used "thee" and "ay". It's definitely more "correct" I'm thinking.
A dog. Ay dog.
A dog. Uh dog.
You're just a freak.
I say "thuh" and "uh" almost all the time. Thinking on it, I may say "thee" apple, but I'm thinking I probably often don't.
I wish I usually used "thee" and "ay". It's definitely more "correct" I'm thinking.
Pronounce "a" differently based on the context, that is. So yes, let's go with the freak diagnosis here.
I don't think it's more correct...I think it just sounds snootier. Especially if you always pronounce it that way.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
1424 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
- 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
690 Views
I pronounce it both ways
- 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
688 Views
It's like "a".
- 23/03/2010 02:45:14 PM
765 Views
Oh. I do that too.
- 23/03/2010 02:59:20 PM
699 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
- 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
653 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
- 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
667 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
- 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
612 Views
What Joe said, almost.
- 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
858 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
416 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
360 Views
Never heard that one
- 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
636 Views
Heh.
- 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
769 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
- 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
719 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
358 Views
One is sufficient.
- 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
825 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
782 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
701 Views
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
701 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
571 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
571 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
- 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
701 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
- 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
899 Views
British English is weird oO
- 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
691 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
- 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
800 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
- 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
658 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
- 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
598 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
- 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
756 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
- 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
620 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
- 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
674 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
- 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
564 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
- 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
671 Views
Even so.
- 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
679 Views
I wasnt invited!
- 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
654 Views
You were so.
- 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
612 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
- 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
679 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
615 Views
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
615 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
- 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
784 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
- 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
631 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
- 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
587 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
- 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
728 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
- 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
797 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
- 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
659 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
607 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
607 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
711 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
711 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
645 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
580 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
655 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
- 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
592 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
677 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
1024 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
733 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
565 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
678 Views
konsekvent
- 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
630 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
415 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
744 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
744 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
374 Views
Cool! I'm in!
- 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
638 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
366 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
366 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
- 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
692 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
- 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
595 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
612 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
799 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
- 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
634 Views

*NM*
*NM*