Most people usually pronounce it one way or another, but rarely both ways.
A dog. Ay dog.
A dog. Uh dog.
You're just a freak.
I say "thuh" and "uh" almost all the time. Thinking on it, I may say "thee" apple, but I'm thinking I probably often don't.
I wish I usually used "thee" and "ay". It's definitely more "correct" I'm thinking.
A dog. Ay dog.
A dog. Uh dog.
You're just a freak.
I say "thuh" and "uh" almost all the time. Thinking on it, I may say "thee" apple, but I'm thinking I probably often don't.
I wish I usually used "thee" and "ay". It's definitely more "correct" I'm thinking.
Pronounce "a" differently based on the context, that is. So yes, let's go with the freak diagnosis here.
I don't think it's more correct...I think it just sounds snootier. Especially if you always pronounce it that way.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
- 1287 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
- 549 Views
I pronounce it both ways
23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
- 542 Views
It's like "a".
23/03/2010 02:45:14 PM
- 640 Views
Oh. I do that too.
23/03/2010 02:59:20 PM
- 559 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
- 519 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
- 507 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
- 466 Views
What Joe said, almost.
23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
- 720 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
- 354 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
- 292 Views
Never heard that one
23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
- 473 Views
Heh.
23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
- 594 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
- 568 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
- 297 Views
One is sufficient.
23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
- 691 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
- 660 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
- 572 Views

Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
- 454 Views

I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
- 544 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
- 745 Views
British English is weird oO
23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
- 555 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
- 663 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
- 512 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
- 474 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
- 614 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
- 483 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
- 541 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
- 422 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
- 531 Views
Even so.
23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
- 531 Views
I wasnt invited!
23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
- 524 Views
You were so.
23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
- 455 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
- 519 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
- 465 Views

Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
- 651 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
- 503 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
- 439 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
- 591 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 618 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
- 517 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
- 470 Views

Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
- 583 Views

*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
- 491 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
- 442 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
- 524 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 449 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
- 545 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
- 860 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
- 593 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
- 427 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
- 554 Views
konsekvent
23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
- 496 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
- 350 Views

Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
- 598 Views

Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
- 301 Views
Cool! I'm in!
23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
- 506 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
- 306 Views

I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
- 546 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
- 462 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
- 454 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
- 625 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
- 483 Views