Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
I mean, in Norwegian you can talk about "eventuelle barn", a bit like "hypothetical children", except that sounds entirely wrong. But it refers not only to children that may show up in the future, but also children that may or may not exist now.
Edit: I just realised you said above that it does not necessarily refer to the future. So that is solved, then.
Dutch is just Norwegian with weird spelling and throat-sounds. A bit like Danish.
Edit: I just realised you said above that it does not necessarily refer to the future. So that is solved, then.
Dutch is just Norwegian with weird spelling and throat-sounds. A bit like Danish.
I've been told by reliable sources that "Norwegian and Danish look alike, but the Norwegians pronounce things the way they are written, whereas the Danish pronunciation doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the way the word is spelled". Which I'm thinking means that "a bit like Danish" isn't exactly a compliment.
And yes, we entirely agree on both konsekvent/consequent and eventuelle/eventuele, then. (Does Norwegian also have that thing where "eventuelle" can be just "eventuel" in certain situations?)
eventuelle refers to more than one. eventuell to one.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
1358 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
- 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
615 Views
I pronounce it both ways
- 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
607 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
- 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
582 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
- 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
601 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
- 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
531 Views
What Joe said, almost.
- 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
785 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
379 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
317 Views
Never heard that one
- 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
566 Views
Heh.
- 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
691 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
- 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
649 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
321 Views
One is sufficient.
- 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
756 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
722 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
637 Views
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
637 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
517 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
517 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
- 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
610 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
- 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
815 Views
British English is weird oO
- 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
622 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
- 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
724 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
- 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
580 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
- 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
536 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
- 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
687 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
- 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
543 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
- 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
609 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
- 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
496 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
- 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
606 Views
Even so.
- 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
589 Views
I wasnt invited!
- 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
584 Views
You were so.
- 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
517 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
- 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
583 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
534 Views
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
534 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
- 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
717 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
- 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
565 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
- 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
509 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
- 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
659 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
- 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
706 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
- 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
588 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
536 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
536 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
648 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
648 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
569 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
512 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
584 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
- 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
524 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
611 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
949 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
659 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
496 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
605 Views
konsekvent
- 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
568 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
376 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
376 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
671 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
671 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
335 Views
Cool! I'm in!
- 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
568 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
331 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
331 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
- 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
628 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
- 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
528 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
520 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
712 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
- 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
549 Views

*NM*
*NM*