Active Users:424 Time:16/06/2026 07:14:27 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong but... Kalazor Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.

Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.


We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.

And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Reply to message
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM 726 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article) - 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM 493 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM* - 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM 183 Views
Yes, but - 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM 518 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus - 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM 474 Views
*NM* - 25/03/2010 05:11:51 PM 217 Views
oo that's awesome. *NM* - 25/03/2010 11:58:35 AM 200 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM 547 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 482 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but... - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM 533 Views
You are wrong. - 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM 480 Views
Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM 543 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM 479 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM 533 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM 517 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 07:12:00 PM 524 Views
fine - 25/03/2010 07:15:44 PM 467 Views
Good - 25/03/2010 07:25:10 PM 503 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM 560 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM 652 Views
what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM 430 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM 541 Views
okay, think of it this way then. - 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM 493 Views
What the? You've been in my office? - 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM 501 Views
you're neither - 25/03/2010 08:12:25 PM 451 Views
That's good. I was starting to worry about myself - 25/03/2010 08:22:42 PM 491 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger. - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 456 Views
Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM 543 Views
Re: Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 05:23:49 PM 477 Views
please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM 480 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM 604 Views
living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM 485 Views
Re: living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:44:09 PM 523 Views
I give you permisison - 25/03/2010 05:44:47 PM 453 Views
My neurons fire just fine... sometimes - 25/03/2010 06:55:39 PM 585 Views
That headline is misleading - 25/03/2010 06:00:16 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message