They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.
Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.
We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.
And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM
595 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article)
- 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM
390 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM*
- 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM
140 Views
Yes, but
- 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM
414 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus
- 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM
370 Views
*NM*
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM
440 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
385 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
- 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
434 Views
You are wrong.
- 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM
377 Views
Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM
435 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM
383 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM
414 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM
414 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM
456 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM
528 Views
what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM
326 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM
422 Views
okay, think of it this way then.
- 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM
390 Views
What the? You've been in my office?
- 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM
385 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger.
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
351 Views
Please reread what I said
- 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM
415 Views
please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM
380 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM
497 Views
living in a small city in Kansas
- 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM
348 Views