They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.
Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.
We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.
And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM
710 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article)
- 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM
472 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM*
- 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM
174 Views
Yes, but
- 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM
499 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus
- 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM
455 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM
533 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
464 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
- 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
522 Views
You are wrong.
- 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM
464 Views
Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM
526 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM
462 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM
516 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM
498 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM
541 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM
635 Views
what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM
409 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM
523 Views
okay, think of it this way then.
- 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM
471 Views
What the? You've been in my office?
- 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM
485 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger.
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
435 Views
Please reread what I said
- 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM
528 Views
please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM
458 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM
587 Views
living in a small city in Kansas
- 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM
455 Views

*NM*