I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner.
Joel Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM
If he gives a concrete answer in most directions, he's bound to incite a non-hypothetical emotional reaction. While I think he should be able to answer the question, I really can understand why he would hedge around doing so. It's a pretty hefty hypothetical that people are going to take as him saying "This is what we will do." Even if that is what they would do, that may entail a huge backlash over a "hypothetical".
I'd probably refrain from giving an actual answer as well
I'd probably refrain from giving an actual answer as well
Whatever he says will provoke the backlash you reference, AND has a very real chance of tying his hands later. Were I the countrys chief prosecutor I'd want as much latitude as possible in dealing with Public Enemy Number One, and certainly wouldn't relinquish it just so one side or the other could take potshots at me.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
AG Eric Holder evades questioning
- 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM
777 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights?
- 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM
567 Views
Why should location matter when dealing with a borderless threat like al-Qaeda? *NM*
- 17/03/2010 10:20:08 PM
217 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality?
- 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM
523 Views
Line 1
- 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM
698 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention.
- 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM
594 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game.
- 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
517 Views
Well, I guess it depends whether you want to try him, doesn't it?
- 19/03/2010 11:34:34 PM
496 Views
*shrugs*
- 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM
528 Views
That doesn't seem very logical
- 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM
616 Views
That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute)
- 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM
573 Views
It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM
485 Views
Re: It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM
578 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM*
- 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM
230 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure
- 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM
514 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys
- 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM
527 Views
I remember a little of that
- 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM
503 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress
- 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM
491 Views
Seems he could answer the question without evasion or producing a soundbite
- 18/03/2010 04:12:04 AM
558 Views
I don't think I agree with that.
- 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM
503 Views
Fair enough
- 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM
507 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect.
- 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
526 Views
do we know how much he actually knows?
- 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM
503 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM*
- 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM
217 Views
that was totally not my question
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
513 Views
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
513 Views
Most people include congressmen/women don't understand Miranda rights,most people don't know the Law
- 18/03/2010 02:08:10 AM
582 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering.
- 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM
574 Views
I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner.
- 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM
462 Views