Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
Oh, I agree that such an ad would never see the light of day here, but certain things said/shown here would not be broadcast there, either. It's just different in what's acceptable and what is not. Cultural differences, more or less.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
I see I see. I've always thought we're a little too sensitive to racial tensions here in the US, but there are times when europeans seem to do things that are downright offensive. The spanish basketball team to name one (I'm not sure if you're familiar but they pulled their eyes back making them thin for a photoshoot for the beijing olympics) and I've heard some seriously concerning stories about african soccer players playing in spain and other parts of europe.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
- 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
2860 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
- 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
863 Views
Uh.
- 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
943 Views
Re: Uh.
- 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
884 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
814 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
916 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
741 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
706 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
- 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
452 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
- 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
790 Views
Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
936 Views
Re: Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
738 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
- 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
768 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
- 29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
760 Views
I don't see it
- 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
799 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
- 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
785 Views
It would not float here in the US
- 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
798 Views
Agreed.
- 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
955 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
- 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
805 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
- 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
1042 Views
MOBO
- 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
758 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
- 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
804 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
- 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
794 Views
Agreed
- 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
830 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
415 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
1045 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
- 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
749 Views