Seriously, what is your deal? Did someone make you the "fixate on one potentially offensive part of a post" admin? I said something that could have been misconstrued, clarified it and I think both Larry and I are on the same page. I certainly don't think I was entirely wrong (Larry conceded that the tensions are at least different, which is a point I can concede as better expressing what I meant) in what I said, but I wasn't wholly right either.
But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.
Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.
If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.
Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.
If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
- 2862 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
- 864 Views
Uh.
22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
- 943 Views
Re: Uh.
29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
- 885 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
- 815 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
- 916 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
- 742 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
- 706 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
- 452 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
- 791 Views
Um.
29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
- 936 Views
Re: Um.
29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
- 738 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
- 768 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
- 760 Views
I don't see it
22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
- 799 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
- 785 Views
It would not float here in the US
22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
- 798 Views
Agreed.
23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
- 955 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
- 806 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
- 1042 Views
MOBO
23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
- 759 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
- 804 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
- 794 Views
Agreed
23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
- 830 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
- 415 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
- 1045 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
- 749 Views