Seriously, what is your deal? Did someone make you the "fixate on one potentially offensive part of a post" admin? I said something that could have been misconstrued, clarified it and I think both Larry and I are on the same page. I certainly don't think I was entirely wrong (Larry conceded that the tensions are at least different, which is a point I can concede as better expressing what I meant) in what I said, but I wasn't wholly right either.
But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.
Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.
If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.
Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.
If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
- 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
2943 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
- 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
913 Views
Uh.
- 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
1003 Views
Re: Uh.
- 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
947 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
863 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
977 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
801 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
764 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
- 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
478 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
- 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
849 Views
Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
997 Views
Re: Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
798 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
- 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
835 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
- 29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
822 Views
I don't see it
- 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
865 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
- 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
829 Views
It would not float here in the US
- 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
853 Views
Agreed.
- 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
1010 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
- 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
868 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
- 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
1100 Views
MOBO
- 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
800 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
- 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
850 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
- 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
840 Views
Agreed
- 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
875 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
437 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
1105 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
- 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
811 Views
