Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
It means that WoW is 6 years newer than Baldur's Gate, and 6 years OLDER than a newly released modern game. Can you see where I'm going with this? 
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW.
From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW. From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones?
- 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM
1024 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue.
- 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM
884 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad
- 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM
757 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
- 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
844 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense
- 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM
997 Views
Oh I understand. 
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
772 Views
- 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
772 Views
they really aren't bad 
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
740 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
740 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
809 Views
- 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
809 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD
- 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM
834 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
- 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
825 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using
- 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM
770 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
756 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
756 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times.
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
783 Views
- 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
783 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM
809 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
- 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM
761 Views
This is a meaningless conversation.
- 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM
730 Views
Your post + Dr. Pepper + front row of serious computer security class = dangerous situation. 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
340 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
340 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad"
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
762 Views
- 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
762 Views
You're a fucking idiot.
- 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM
722 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
789 Views
- 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
789 Views
Please don't.
- 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM
759 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
375 Views
wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
- 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
375 Views
Hm. I'd have to buy a lot more donuts if I worked over there. *NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
359 Views
*NM*
- 14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
359 Views
Haha, I'm just happy that what I said made any sense....I honestly don't remember posting that. *NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
495 Views
*NM*
- 12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
495 Views
I've noticed that MMO's that have tried to usurp WoW with superior graphics have failed.
- 12/09/2010 07:33:13 PM
785 Views
I agree, I was shocked that my netbook could run wow at acceptable settings
- 13/09/2010 05:21:44 AM
692 Views
Why would I want to? 
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
369 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
369 Views