Active Users:2334 Time:18/06/2026 03:36:16 AM
You're one of those types that just likes to argue, aren't you? Aemon Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 04:53:04 AM
When it comes to graphics, the average gamer uses "good" and "bad" to roughly compare a game to current standards. When a kid goes into a game store and says "these graphics are awesome!" he doesn't mean, "these graphics are awesome compared to what was available in 1998!"

If that's what YOU mean when you say "good," then fine: WoW has good graphics. You'll find yourself to be in the minority with that viewpoint, however. Still, I guess I really can't argue with you any more. WoW graphics are provably below modern standards, by a significant margin. When graphics are far below the standard norm, I consider them bad. As do most other gamers. If you don't, well. . .*shrugs* That's grand. Enjoy your Warcraft. :P

Reply to message
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones? - 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM 1131 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue. - 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM 1000 Views
WoW graphics don't matter that much.` - 11/09/2010 10:22:23 PM 902 Views
They matter to me. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:58:50 AM 449 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad - 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM 879 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior. - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM 972 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense - 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM 1128 Views
Oh I understand. - 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM 897 Views
they really aren't bad - 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM 862 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does - 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM 919 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD - 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM 960 Views
Yes, they are. - 12/09/2010 10:04:49 PM 934 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right? - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM 944 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using - 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM 889 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM 881 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM 908 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM 938 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM 899 Views
Mass Effect 2 isn't that demanding if you have a desktop - 13/09/2010 02:46:09 PM 891 Views
I could, if I really wanted to - 13/09/2010 09:16:07 PM 1066 Views
This is a meaningless conversation. - 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM 864 Views
Not at all - 13/09/2010 09:25:08 PM 931 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad" - 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM 899 Views
You're one of those types that just likes to argue, aren't you? - 13/09/2010 04:53:04 AM 855 Views
Pong: great graphics or greatest graphics? - 13/09/2010 05:23:56 AM 942 Views
WoW graphics are bad for todays standards *NM* - 13/09/2010 05:32:32 AM 404 Views
You're a fucking idiot. - 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM 845 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about - 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM 908 Views
Please don't. - 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM 864 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM* - 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM 428 Views
Desktop or gtfo. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:54:36 AM 406 Views
Seconded. *NM* - 13/09/2010 09:00:55 PM 504 Views
Why would I want to? *NM* - 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM 424 Views
I can see how it would be sort of neat. - 13/09/2010 07:30:40 PM 827 Views
Something like that. - 13/09/2010 08:20:55 PM 961 Views
You can already do auction stuff - 13/09/2010 09:35:04 PM 914 Views
not to long - 27/09/2010 07:17:21 AM 1048 Views

Reply to Message