Active Users:681 Time:13/11/2026 12:14:01 AM
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior. Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
You might enjoy the way that World of Warcraft looks, and that's completely fine; Blizzard has a talented art team, and they know what they're doing. However, WoW was released six years ago, and was designed to run acceptably on low end 2004 systems. WoW had "low end" graphics six years ago, and hasn't improved much since. They're way behind.

Anyway, I'm not trying to say you're wrong, exactly, because if you like the graphics, then they are "good." Ghav is absolutely right, though, when he says that WoW's graphics are antiquated. He's understating things, really. ;) The level of detail is just not there. It's like comparing one of the first Disney movies to a modern Pixar film. Disney looks nice, sure, but the devil is in the details.
Reply to message
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones? - 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM 1194 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue. - 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM 1064 Views
WoW graphics don't matter that much.` - 11/09/2010 10:22:23 PM 975 Views
They matter to me. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:58:50 AM 486 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad - 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM 954 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior. - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM 1068 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense - 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM 1204 Views
Oh I understand. - 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM 965 Views
they really aren't bad - 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM 931 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does - 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM 993 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD - 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM 1036 Views
Yes, they are. - 12/09/2010 10:04:49 PM 1021 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right? - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM 1026 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using - 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM 989 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM 951 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM 972 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM 1019 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM 984 Views
Mass Effect 2 isn't that demanding if you have a desktop - 13/09/2010 02:46:09 PM 964 Views
I could, if I really wanted to - 13/09/2010 09:16:07 PM 1146 Views
This is a meaningless conversation. - 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM 947 Views
Not at all - 13/09/2010 09:25:08 PM 1036 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad" - 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM 979 Views
Pong: great graphics or greatest graphics? - 13/09/2010 05:23:56 AM 1012 Views
WoW graphics are bad for todays standards *NM* - 13/09/2010 05:32:32 AM 444 Views
You're a fucking idiot. - 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM 918 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about - 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM 970 Views
Please don't. - 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM 935 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM* - 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM 461 Views
Desktop or gtfo. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:54:36 AM 442 Views
Seconded. *NM* - 13/09/2010 09:00:55 PM 542 Views
Why would I want to? *NM* - 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM 458 Views
I can see how it would be sort of neat. - 13/09/2010 07:30:40 PM 907 Views
Something like that. - 13/09/2010 08:20:55 PM 1049 Views
You can already do auction stuff - 13/09/2010 09:35:04 PM 985 Views
not to long - 27/09/2010 07:17:21 AM 1124 Views

Reply to Message