Active Users:707 Time:13/11/2026 12:24:00 AM
You're one of those types that just likes to argue, aren't you? Aemon Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 04:53:04 AM
When it comes to graphics, the average gamer uses "good" and "bad" to roughly compare a game to current standards. When a kid goes into a game store and says "these graphics are awesome!" he doesn't mean, "these graphics are awesome compared to what was available in 1998!"

If that's what YOU mean when you say "good," then fine: WoW has good graphics. You'll find yourself to be in the minority with that viewpoint, however. Still, I guess I really can't argue with you any more. WoW graphics are provably below modern standards, by a significant margin. When graphics are far below the standard norm, I consider them bad. As do most other gamers. If you don't, well. . .*shrugs* That's grand. Enjoy your Warcraft. :P

Reply to message
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones? - 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM 1195 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue. - 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM 1064 Views
WoW graphics don't matter that much.` - 11/09/2010 10:22:23 PM 976 Views
They matter to me. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:58:50 AM 486 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad - 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM 956 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior. - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM 1068 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense - 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM 1206 Views
Oh I understand. - 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM 967 Views
they really aren't bad - 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM 932 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does - 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM 995 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD - 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM 1037 Views
Yes, they are. - 12/09/2010 10:04:49 PM 1022 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right? - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM 1028 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using - 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM 989 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM 952 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM 973 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM 1020 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM 986 Views
Mass Effect 2 isn't that demanding if you have a desktop - 13/09/2010 02:46:09 PM 965 Views
I could, if I really wanted to - 13/09/2010 09:16:07 PM 1147 Views
This is a meaningless conversation. - 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM 948 Views
Not at all - 13/09/2010 09:25:08 PM 1037 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad" - 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM 980 Views
You're one of those types that just likes to argue, aren't you? - 13/09/2010 04:53:04 AM 949 Views
Pong: great graphics or greatest graphics? - 13/09/2010 05:23:56 AM 1013 Views
WoW graphics are bad for todays standards *NM* - 13/09/2010 05:32:32 AM 445 Views
You're a fucking idiot. - 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM 919 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about - 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM 972 Views
Please don't. - 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM 936 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM* - 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM 462 Views
Desktop or gtfo. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:54:36 AM 442 Views
Seconded. *NM* - 13/09/2010 09:00:55 PM 542 Views
Why would I want to? *NM* - 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM 459 Views
I can see how it would be sort of neat. - 13/09/2010 07:30:40 PM 907 Views
Something like that. - 13/09/2010 08:20:55 PM 1049 Views
You can already do auction stuff - 13/09/2010 09:35:04 PM 987 Views
not to long - 27/09/2010 07:17:21 AM 1124 Views

Reply to Message