Active Users:822 Time:15/09/2025 04:35:59 PM
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. Aemon Send a noteboard - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM
If you're running 1680 x 1050, your 5670 should be able to run most games (including Cataclysm) on very high settings. Without testing it I don't know what "Ultra" entails, but you should be able to run near the top of the settings spectrum. This is assuming that you have a decent processor and enough RAM, obviously. If you can't, something is probably wrong. Definitely update the drivers; you should see noticeable improvements, but don't expect night and day.

If you're trying to run 1920 x 1200, you'll only be able to run most games on low details. If this is the resolution you're using, then your results sound pretty standard to me, and you shouldn't expect to improve much no matter what you try. I would recommend against trying to overclock the card if you don't know what you're doing, and can't easily afford a replacement.

If I were you, I'd update your drivers, and see what you think. If you're not happy with the results, or if you're determined to game at 1920, return your card, and buy a 5770. This should set you back about $150, and, in my opinion, is probably the best bang-for-your-buck card out there in the 1920 arena.

Good luck. :)
Reply to message
In need of graphics card advice. (edit with update) - 29/10/2010 04:01:37 PM 663 Views
That's the card in my new iMac. Well, according to Apple, at least... - 29/10/2010 04:45:19 PM 560 Views
A 9800GT is roughly equivalent to a 5670. *NM* - 29/10/2010 04:58:07 PM 260 Views
I've no problem deferring to someone more familiar w/ recent cards. - 29/10/2010 05:44:20 PM 442 Views
Each architecture is different and better at different things. - 29/10/2010 08:16:14 PM 398 Views
Your card isn't an ati hd5670, it is about 75% as fast as an 8800gt - 01/11/2010 01:34:47 AM 540 Views
Good to know. - 01/11/2010 01:45:15 PM 394 Views
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM 403 Views
System specs: - 29/10/2010 05:39:19 PM 400 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 08:22:38 PM 414 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 09:30:24 PM 377 Views
I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:22:20 PM 474 Views
Re: I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:35:30 PM 458 Views
Thanks for the update! This makes my choice easy *NM* - 31/10/2010 02:56:38 AM 209 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 31/10/2010 01:12:00 PM 184 Views
The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card - 31/10/2010 02:23:45 PM 471 Views
Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about. - 01/11/2010 01:42:31 PM 398 Views
Fry's Electronics *NM* - 01/11/2010 01:45:23 PM 187 Views
If you do return the card, these are the cards I would recommend (links inside to newegg) - 01/11/2010 02:32:23 AM 441 Views
Excellent post - 01/11/2010 05:06:10 PM 590 Views
The 460 is a better card than a 465 - 02/11/2010 03:11:10 AM 377 Views
And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 03:14:10 AM 384 Views
Re: And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 12:52:46 PM 416 Views
Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 06:14:16 PM 518 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 08:01:21 PM 383 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 09:19:44 PM 571 Views
Do you already have a computer or are you building a new one? If so what are the specs? And .... - 03/11/2010 10:49:35 AM 407 Views
Well - 03/11/2010 08:31:11 PM 579 Views
Sorry I remember now - 03/11/2010 11:41:14 PM 426 Views
Re: Sorry I remember now - 04/11/2010 05:45:22 PM 574 Views
If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 12:28:44 AM 553 Views
Re: If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 06:02:57 PM 408 Views
HP doesn't use homemade harddrives - 04/11/2010 07:41:35 PM 409 Views

Reply to Message