Active Users:570 Time:16/11/2025 09:13:20 PM
Each architecture is different and better at different things. Aemon Send a noteboard - 29/10/2010 08:16:14 PM
As I understand the two, the 5670 should be, in general, slightly faster than the 9800 GT, as a result of its higher memory bandwidth. The 9800 GT, on the other hand, should be superior in the areas of AF, and AA. This means that you will receive higher framerates with the 5670, but when framerate isn't an issue, games may look slightly better with the 9800 GT, as you can have AA and whatnot turned up higher.

It's something of a crapshoot as to which you prefer. It's also hard to say "card x is BETTER than card y" when their specs are anywhere near similar, and, in the case of these two cards, they're very similar. If I had to pick one I'd go with the 5670, because it supports DX11 and uses roughly half the power of the 9800 GT. Still, regardless of which one is "better," the point of my response to you was just to point out that he shouldn't return his 5670 to get a 9800, as he's likely to get a different, but not better, experience.

I definitely agree with your assessment that it's better to spend just a little more and get a card you know you'll be happy with, though.
This message last edited by Aemon on 29/10/2010 at 08:16:20 PM
Reply to message
In need of graphics card advice. (edit with update) - 29/10/2010 04:01:37 PM 693 Views
That's the card in my new iMac. Well, according to Apple, at least... - 29/10/2010 04:45:19 PM 581 Views
A 9800GT is roughly equivalent to a 5670. *NM* - 29/10/2010 04:58:07 PM 264 Views
I've no problem deferring to someone more familiar w/ recent cards. - 29/10/2010 05:44:20 PM 452 Views
Each architecture is different and better at different things. - 29/10/2010 08:16:14 PM 436 Views
Your card isn't an ati hd5670, it is about 75% as fast as an 8800gt - 01/11/2010 01:34:47 AM 550 Views
Good to know. - 01/11/2010 01:45:15 PM 409 Views
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM 410 Views
System specs: - 29/10/2010 05:39:19 PM 408 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 08:22:38 PM 425 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 09:30:24 PM 387 Views
I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:22:20 PM 483 Views
Re: I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:35:30 PM 473 Views
Thanks for the update! This makes my choice easy *NM* - 31/10/2010 02:56:38 AM 221 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 31/10/2010 01:12:00 PM 188 Views
The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card - 31/10/2010 02:23:45 PM 504 Views
Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about. - 01/11/2010 01:42:31 PM 405 Views
Fry's Electronics *NM* - 01/11/2010 01:45:23 PM 192 Views
If you do return the card, these are the cards I would recommend (links inside to newegg) - 01/11/2010 02:32:23 AM 453 Views
Excellent post - 01/11/2010 05:06:10 PM 602 Views
The 460 is a better card than a 465 - 02/11/2010 03:11:10 AM 386 Views
And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 03:14:10 AM 394 Views
Re: And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 12:52:46 PM 453 Views
Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 06:14:16 PM 550 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 08:01:21 PM 393 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 09:19:44 PM 584 Views
Do you already have a computer or are you building a new one? If so what are the specs? And .... - 03/11/2010 10:49:35 AM 417 Views
Well - 03/11/2010 08:31:11 PM 608 Views
Sorry I remember now - 03/11/2010 11:41:14 PM 434 Views
Re: Sorry I remember now - 04/11/2010 05:45:22 PM 599 Views
If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 12:28:44 AM 565 Views
Re: If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 06:02:57 PM 421 Views
HP doesn't use homemade harddrives - 04/11/2010 07:41:35 PM 419 Views

Reply to Message