Active Users:317 Time:16/07/2025 05:42:17 PM
He certainly was. Tom Send a noteboard - 10/08/2017 08:02:46 PM

His books from the 1970s and early 1980s are readable. The ones after that are generally bad. I also thought the Stand was bad because he took an interesting premise and ruined it.

I think the only book of his I'd re-read would be The Shining, because it was so much better than the movie, and the movie was great.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Any opinions on Stephen King's Dark Tower series? - 09/08/2017 05:45:02 AM 498 Views
Interesting question. - 09/08/2017 07:59:20 AM 436 Views
Was King a better writer when he was on coke? - 09/08/2017 03:34:57 PM 386 Views
He certainly was. - 10/08/2017 08:02:46 PM 348 Views
I believe a bunch of posters on Wotmania/RAFO said..... - 10/08/2017 03:38:51 AM 408 Views
those people must have never read Battle Field Earth *NM* - 10/08/2017 04:02:27 AM 209 Views
I think BFE sucked from the first page..... - 10/08/2017 04:10:22 AM 365 Views
But the ending ruined any chance of making the rest worth it *NM* - 10/08/2017 01:24:10 PM 194 Views
I thought The Gunslinger and Wizard and Glass were the best of the 7 original books. - 10/08/2017 05:03:19 AM 410 Views
Wizard and Glass was awesome. - 10/08/2017 08:10:01 PM 382 Views

Reply to Message