Active Users:496 Time:29/10/2026 03:11:24 PM
But along those same lines.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 18/04/2019 11:54:06 PM

At least in the show....the immunity to fire/heat seems exclusive to Danny. In the books at least, Jon did burn his hand on the lantern when the walkers/zombies/whatever we call them here woke up (book/season 1). Her brother Visceras (sp?) was certainly not resistant to heat. And presumably the old Maester Ammon could burn himself on something. We didn't see it, but one can't imagine he could live at the Wall for years, and no one notice that the old man is totally good with fire/hot.

I think that Danny's immunity to heat/fire is a result of the show writers trying to demonstrate that she is special/The Slayer/whatever. If anything, Jon having Stark blood from his mother's side would only make him partially immune.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Game of Thrones - Final Season Thread! - 15/04/2019 01:30:10 AM 1869 Views
I am on Team Cersei, only about half ironically - 15/04/2019 04:50:38 AM 746 Views
Sansa had no control over her first marriage - 15/04/2019 08:34:47 AM 695 Views
Re: Sansa had no control over her first marriage - 15/04/2019 02:17:40 PM 713 Views
I liked it. - 15/04/2019 08:25:01 AM 708 Views
I assume Bran can use his Bran-abilities to prove Jon's backstory. - 15/04/2019 02:13:21 PM 648 Views
What are you, some kind of book snob? *NM* - 15/04/2019 02:18:28 PM 294 Views
Anyway, thoughts on the episode - 17/04/2019 12:42:05 PM 717 Views
They're attempting to create political tension between Jon and Dany. - 17/04/2019 01:16:59 PM 616 Views
Agreed - 17/04/2019 08:58:29 PM 679 Views
To prove Targaryen ancestry - 18/04/2019 07:26:02 PM 640 Views
But along those same lines.... - 18/04/2019 11:54:06 PM 620 Views
Cersei's got other plans for the Targeryan girl - 22/04/2019 10:57:32 AM 650 Views
The title of the finale episode needs to be.. - 22/04/2019 06:00:18 PM 662 Views

Reply to Message