Active Users:200 Time:30/04/2024 12:30:55 PM
Re: I agree with a lot of this, though there's also stuff that irks me. Legolas Send a noteboard - 19/04/2019 06:56:30 PM

View original postI thought it was because industry on the continent leans toward Germany. Seriously, though, hasn't northeastern France historically been the most industrial part of the country?

Yes, but still it's pretty obvious if you look at a map - most French reactors are either built near the coast, or very, very close to the borders with Belgium and Germany. That's not a coincidence - putting them there means fewer NIMBY voters whose support you might lose.



View original postExcept nuclear works and wind and solar power haven't proven very economic or reliable, not least because wind & sunshine are not constants in the way hydroelectric or nuclear energy are. And nuclear power is not necessarily synonymous with uranium. It might be possible to fiss( ? ) other materials (plutonium? hydrogen? ) for energy. At the very least, nuclear power gives us time to figure out renewable resources between now and whenever we do run out of uranium.

Yes, I agree, nuclear should remain part of the equation.
View original postAnyway, with fossil fuel reserves at an all time high, the idea of running out is a fairly specious argument, since we don't know how much fossil fuel or uranium is on the planet anyway. Push comes to shove, we can always put poor people on treadmills.

It's true that we have come a long way since the first panicky reports of running out in the 1970s... but it's not only about running out on a global level, it's also about where it's located and what that means for your geopolitical position. It's all fine and dandy as long as you can get your oil from the US or Canada and your uranium from Canada or Australia, but rather more dicey if you have to get it from places like Somalia (which apparently has huge uranium reserves). Both for the purchasing countries and for the producing country, if they don't have anything resembling safe labour and environmental standards.
Reply to message
The Real Reason They Hate Nuclear Is Because It Means We Don't Need Renewables - 18/04/2019 07:33:37 PM 727 Views
It would be even better if more widely adopted. - 18/04/2019 07:44:28 PM 353 Views
And according to Stan Lee, we will get superheroes out of it! *NM* - 19/04/2019 03:55:21 AM 171 Views
Definitely agreed. - 19/04/2019 01:08:14 PM 347 Views
I agree with a lot of this, though there's also stuff that irks me. - 18/04/2019 08:56:01 PM 382 Views
Re: I agree with a lot of this, though there's also stuff that irks me. - 19/04/2019 03:53:24 AM 335 Views
Re: I agree with a lot of this, though there's also stuff that irks me. - 19/04/2019 06:56:30 PM 351 Views
True - 19/04/2019 01:07:06 PM 332 Views
I'd say yes, but the devil is in the details... *NM* - 19/04/2019 06:57:07 PM 179 Views
I've never really connected the two... - 18/04/2019 10:32:34 PM 339 Views
I never had much regard for that argument - 19/04/2019 04:02:12 AM 361 Views
They didn't mention the oil & coal industries. - 19/04/2019 04:07:16 AM 368 Views
The Left wants to establish a direct connection between climate change and the evils of capitalism - 20/04/2019 12:13:49 AM 321 Views
Perhaps it is the opposite? - 20/04/2019 01:10:18 AM 338 Views
Perhaps not - 20/04/2019 04:17:34 AM 340 Views

Reply to Message