Re: Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'?
moondog Send a noteboard - 23/04/2019 10:15:10 PM
View original post
I find this very troubling and undemocratic.
Do you think that if the Bush DoJ and FBI would have gotten permission to intercept phone calls from Obama campaign staffers, they would find nothing at all suspicious ?
Imagine if most of the major media outlets would provide them with uncritical appraisal and encourage leaking from the new Obama WH ?
You'll have Special Inquisitors romping around DC after each election.
I find this very troubling and undemocratic.
Do you think that if the Bush DoJ and FBI would have gotten permission to intercept phone calls from Obama campaign staffers, they would find nothing at all suspicious ?
Imagine if most of the major media outlets would provide them with uncritical appraisal and encourage leaking from the new Obama WH ?
You'll have Special Inquisitors romping around DC after each election.
that depends: did any Obama campaign people repeatedly talk to foreign agents that were under FBI and CIA surveillance? No? then your point is just "Obama bad", is that it?
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Powerful Op/Ed that summarizes the entire Russia Collusion nonsense.....
- 19/04/2019 01:21:10 PM
696 Views
- 19/04/2019 02:13:36 PM
536 Views
- 19/04/2019 02:13:36 PM
536 Views
Crazy libs are now down to the following.....since absolutely no collusion
- 19/04/2019 04:22:16 PM
408 Views
Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'?
- 19/04/2019 06:44:03 PM
425 Views
Re: Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'?
- 20/04/2019 04:45:17 PM
443 Views
Re: Who is this article addressed to? Who is 'you'?
- 23/04/2019 10:15:10 PM
611 Views