Here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/nyregion/bill-clinton-jeffrey-epstein.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer

This one goes into detail on Epstein's connections to both Clinton and Trump:

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/9/20686347/jeffrey-epstein-trump-bill-clinton

This one is a fairly long list of famous people from the Right and Left who are Epstein cronies:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-bill-clinton-donald-trump-alan-dershowitz.html

Neither Clinton nor Trump gets any unusual amounts of coverage. There is more mention of Epstein and Trump because Trump hired the Federal Prosecutor who made the now-infamous plea deal to be his Labor Secretary, and has continued to stand by him. You can be sure that if Hillary Clinton were President today, and had hired Acosta to her cabinet, or even the Florida prosecutor, there would be greater focus on her husband's relationship with Epstein than Trump's.

You seem to have this bizarre idea that the media's focus on the current President is a sign of bias. When has the sitting President's connection to anything taken a backseat to another person? Name-recognition sells, but also, if the Commander-in-Chief is in the hot seat for skeevy connections, you better hope the media focus on that over something less relevant.