With sacred things, you refrain from transgressing against it, but you do not presume to overreach your obligations. That's hubris and sacrilege.
You people repeatedly refuse to understand the distinction between violating a right and taking responsibility for another's right. You have an obligation to not take life or the other natural rights, like liberty or property. But taking control of life or the exercise of liberty or the disposition of property are transgressions at the other extreme, and very often infringe on a different one of the rights than the one they are attempting to promote. Taking undue responsibility for other lives often requires impeding the liberty of the ones you are trying to save or others whose actions might be imagined to pose a threat to those lives. Taking undue responsibility for another's freedom, likewise transgresses that very freedom, such as their freedom of inaction, or the freedom of others with regard to associating or the property of others, to enable the empowerment of the subject. Taking undue responsibility for another's property, again, often infringes on the right of the owner to do as he wishes, allegedly for his own benefit, often infringes on the property rights of others(i.e. illicit redistribution), as well as the liberty of those compelled to assist in the improvement of said property.
"Don't kill" is not the same as arbitrarily ruin others' lives in a vain and futile effort to wrap one life, or a set of lives, in a protective bubble.
