Active Users:106 Time:10/08/2022 03:20:23 AM
I am looking to see if the sky turned purple because I agree with you Tom Send a noteboard - 14/10/2021 11:42:46 PM

Though I also think that the entire reason the Bond franchise worked was because it also never took itself too seriously ... until Daniel Craig. Now it takes itself WAY too seriously, and it sucks. Bond wasn't just out of time. He was outrageous. He was the guy who blew something up, had sex with ten women and then made the baccarat table on time in a flawlessly pressed tuxedo, drank ten martinis and then soberly lit a cigarette while seducing 20 more women.

Bond lost that, and the franchise lost itself.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A thing I am wondering about with regard to characterization (Spoilers for No Time to Die & WoT) - 14/10/2021 07:51:46 AM 267 Views
I see what you did there - 14/10/2021 04:29:27 PM 106 Views
have not watched, yet I think the Craig era is a mistake - 14/10/2021 10:59:57 PM 76 Views
I am looking to see if the sky turned purple because I agree with you - 14/10/2021 11:42:46 PM 108 Views
hey - 15/10/2021 12:01:10 AM 69 Views
It is not a James Bond movie - 15/10/2021 03:13:52 AM 102 Views
Re: A thing I am wondering about with regard to characterization (Spoilers for No Time to Die & WoT) - 15/10/2021 05:11:22 PM 105 Views
But Egwene's act was altruistic - 15/10/2021 05:31:31 PM 92 Views
Re: But Egwene's act was altruistic - 18/10/2021 09:32:49 PM 106 Views
I really need to finish my reread. - 20/10/2021 09:01:38 PM 56 Views

Reply to Message