Active Users:886 Time:31/01/2026 08:04:12 PM
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


Where is the hypocrisy? What text of the Constitution does this violate? Basically, the Supreme Court is telling the District Court not to interfere with the decision of the elected officials of the state. The Constitution gives the power to determine things like this to the states, not the federal courts.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 916 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 622 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 338 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 595 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 583 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 672 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 555 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 554 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 574 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 596 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 332 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 577 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 606 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 577 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 315 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 618 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 332 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 571 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 565 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 531 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 571 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 544 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 791 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 571 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 321 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 587 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 544 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 593 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 556 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 560 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 617 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 599 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 538 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 594 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 535 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 566 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 718 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 528 Views

Reply to Message