Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?
Judicial activism
- 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM
977 Views
Can you reference
- 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM
693 Views
Here
- 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM
654 Views
So I can't read it
- 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM
656 Views
I don't understand that..
- 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM
621 Views
we actually agree on this
- 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM
611 Views
Not just in 2022, though
- 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM
637 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point.
- 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM
648 Views
well I feel stupid
- 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM
641 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one.
- 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM
671 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
- 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
360 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt.
- 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM
649 Views
Not your best analogy.
- 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM
633 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion
- 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM
633 Views
I'm sure you do
- 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM
593 Views
Your point is to troll
- 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM
653 Views
I'm truly devastated...
- 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM
614 Views
Will this continue?
- 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM
609 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse"
- 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM
652 Views

*NM*
*NM*
