Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?
Judicial activism
- 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM
885 Views
Can you reference
- 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM
586 Views
Here
- 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM
548 Views
So I can't read it
- 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM
552 Views
I don't understand that..
- 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM
519 Views
we actually agree on this
- 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM
513 Views
Not just in 2022, though
- 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM
541 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point.
- 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM
555 Views
well I feel stupid
- 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM
535 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one.
- 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM
553 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
- 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
310 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt.
- 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM
539 Views
Not your best analogy.
- 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM
527 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion
- 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM
532 Views
I'm sure you do
- 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM
512 Views
Your point is to troll
- 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM
555 Views
I'm truly devastated...
- 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM
509 Views
Will this continue?
- 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM
529 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse"
- 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM
544 Views

*NM*
*NM*
