Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?
Judicial activism
09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM
- 783 Views
Can you reference
09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM
- 492 Views
Here
09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM
- 457 Views
So I can't read it
09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM
- 455 Views
I don't understand that..
12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM
- 414 Views
we actually agree on this
12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM
- 424 Views
Not just in 2022, though
12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM
- 423 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point.
12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM
- 430 Views
well I feel stupid
10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM
- 427 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one.
10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM
- 398 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
- 268 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt.
12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM
- 437 Views
Not your best analogy.
12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM
- 422 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion
16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM
- 438 Views
I'm sure you do
16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM
- 427 Views
Your point is to troll
16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM
- 446 Views
I'm truly devastated...
17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM
- 418 Views
Will this continue?
17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM
- 428 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse"
17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM
- 444 Views