Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?
Judicial activism
- 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM
949 Views
Can you reference
- 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM
657 Views
Here
- 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM
628 Views
So I can't read it
- 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM
614 Views
I don't understand that..
- 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM
585 Views
we actually agree on this
- 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM
579 Views
Not just in 2022, though
- 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM
609 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point.
- 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM
622 Views
well I feel stupid
- 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM
609 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one.
- 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM
639 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
- 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
347 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt.
- 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM
614 Views
Not your best analogy.
- 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM
597 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion
- 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM
599 Views
I'm sure you do
- 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM
570 Views
Your point is to troll
- 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM
624 Views
I'm truly devastated...
- 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM
586 Views
Will this continue?
- 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM
584 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse"
- 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM
627 Views

*NM*
*NM*
