Active Users:332 Time:25/04/2024 04:05:55 PM
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


Where is the hypocrisy? What text of the Constitution does this violate? Basically, the Supreme Court is telling the District Court not to interfere with the decision of the elected officials of the state. The Constitution gives the power to determine things like this to the states, not the federal courts.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 529 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 233 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 100 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 205 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 196 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 229 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 166 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 175 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 176 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 168 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 92 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 183 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 158 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 179 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 95 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 195 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 96 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 180 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 161 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 161 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 156 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 171 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 218 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 182 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 98 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 157 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 160 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 173 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 169 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 172 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 165 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 175 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 152 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 166 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 156 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 173 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 175 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 132 Views

Reply to Message