But the sugar is your unquestioning drinking of Kool aid.
Says the guy who thinks the Secret Service ius in league with Trump to overthrow America, lol.
And you didn't bother to think what it means?
So you know, because of the Freedom of Information Act, and other Acts that allow classes of information to be subpoenad, there is no government level device replacement or update that ever occurs without multiple backups of all data that could be requested based on these laws. The law itself mandates that all such records need to be backed up, and anytime one agency is doing replacement or updates of devices, there are lawyers from other agencies who review the work, so there's really no way for there to not have been multiple backups of those texts, because Secret Service phones are government property, and intra-agency texts, while not something the public can request, can in fact be legitimately requested by Congress.
Now, the Secret Service can reasonably claim deletion during device replacement. It does get deleted in that process. When they also say "no backups were found", then come back to me, and we can discuss why there's no backup.
That's sure fire evidence that the Secret Service was working with Trump to create a Trump dictatorship in America. Good point. When do the treason executions begin?
Please do reply with more of the same. It's fascinating to observe.
Hey say what you want, parody account, you're the one peddling conspiracy theories here: I've never once signed on to any conspiracy theory. You're saying the Secret Service is working with Trump to overturn American Democracy. That's nuts no matter how you spin it.
But in such a discussion of moral relativity, it should matter how authority responded to those questioning it, no? And that's where a very stark gap emerges, again with an overwhelming flood of video and photographic evidence.
So accepting there were insurrections in 2020, do you believe there's a difference between an insurrection occuring in response to violent reprisal from authority, and one that occurs without such violence from government/the state?
Right - the authority in California, Oregon (especially Portland and CHOP), Minnesota, Wisconsin, Georgia, New York, etc. all responded by....doing nothing.
Atlanta was a war zone. Portland was the wild west. Chicago was...well, Chicago. Detroit was Detroit. The common theme is that BLM and Antifa rioters got their run for weeks and weeks on end, with the cops and everyone else too afraid to go near them without causing another George Floyd. A rape? Shooting? Murder? Nah, cops weren't going anywhere near it if it happened in a BLM/Antifa area.
Declare your area's independence from the USA? That's cool, cops won't even try and go in and restore order to help residents who live there and businesses. No-go zones based on race and political affiliation? You better believe there was no chance of police preventing that.
January 6? We have 500 arrests, a congressional witch hunt, and Democrats the country over clutching their pearls over the fact that "AMERICA WAS ALMOST OVERTHROWN!!!!!!!!!1111!!!"
So yeah, let's compare the authority's response to the two incidents, especially the "overwhelming flood of video and photographic evidence" that shows that police fought Capitol rioters as it was happening and did jack shit to stop the Antifa/BLM ones for fucking months on end.
- 16/07/2022 12:32:06 AM
98 Views
- 23/07/2022 10:50:57 PM
62 Views