Active Users:268 Time:05/05/2024 07:00:07 AM
This is from a publication by The Brookings Institute on China's long game. damookster Send a noteboard - 06/09/2022 04:20:19 PM

"The book argues that the core of US-China competition since the Cold War has been over regional and now global order. It focuses on the strategies that rising powers like China use to displace an established hegemon like the United States short of war. A hegemon’s position in regional and global order emerges from three broad “forms of control” that are used to regulate the behavior of other states: coercive capability (to force compliance), consensual inducements (to incentivize it), and legitimacy (to rightfully command it). For rising states, the act of peacefully displacing the hegemon consists of two broad strategies generally pursued in sequence. The first strategy is to blunt the hegemon’s exercise of those forms of control, particularly those extended over the rising state; after all, no rising state can displace the hegemon if it remains at the hegemon’s mercy. The second is to build forms of control over others; indeed, no rising state can become a hegemon if it cannot secure the deference of other states through coercive threats, consensual inducements, or rightful legitimacy. Unless a rising power has first blunted the hegemon, efforts to build order are likely to be futile and easily opposed. And until a rising power has successfully conducted a good degree of blunting and building in its home region, it remains too vulnerable to the hegemon’s influence to confidently turn to a third strategy, global expansion, which pursues both blunting and building at the global level to displace the hegemon from international leadership. Together, these strategies at the regional and then global levels provide a rough means of ascent for the Chinese Communist Party’s nationalist elites, who seek to restore China to its due place and roll back the historical aberration of the West’s overwhelming global influence."

"This is a template China has followed, and in its review of China’s strategies of displacement, the book argues that shifts from one strategy to the next have been triggered by sharp discontinuities in the most important variable shaping Chinese grand strategy: its perception of US power and threat. China’s first strategy of displacement (1989–2008 ) was to quietly blunt American power over China, particularly in Asia, and it emerged after the traumatic trifecta of Tiananmen Square, the Gulf War, and the Soviet collapse led Beijing to sharply increase its perception of US threat. China’s second strategy of displacement (2008–2016) sought to build the foundation for regional hegemony in Asia, and it was launched after the Global Financial Crisis led Beijing to see US power as diminished and emboldened it to take a more confident approach. Now, with the invocation of “great changes unseen in a century” following Brexit, President Trump’s election, and the coronavirus pandemic, China is launching a third strategy of displacement, one that expands its blunting and building efforts worldwide to displace the United States as the global leader. In its final chapters, this book uses insights about China’s strategy to formulate an asymmetric US grand strategy in response—one that takes a page from China’s own book—and would seek to contest China’s regional and global ambitions without competing dollar-for-dollar, ship-for-ship, or loan-for-loan."

Obviously, this is opinion and can certainly be challenged. But the point is I didn't pull that statement out of my ass.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
This message last edited by damookster on 06/09/2022 at 04:21:43 PM
Reply to message
I'm curious and perhaps a little confused. - 04/09/2022 11:40:54 PM 267 Views
I am against what I am about to say. - 04/09/2022 11:58:51 PM 112 Views
Obviously I realize is is not an either/or question. - 05/09/2022 02:31:19 AM 95 Views
My opinion about people who profit about the fact "rome" is burning - 05/09/2022 02:43:33 AM 95 Views
Stupid assholes, who utter to the other "I HAVE A SCHEME !" - 05/09/2022 02:46:03 AM 87 Views
He's got the media in his pocket. He can say whatever he wants. - 05/09/2022 10:27:08 AM 95 Views
Our nation's fucked. - 05/09/2022 04:02:20 PM 106 Views
In your ideal history, what events would happen differently? *NM* - 05/09/2022 07:02:26 PM 51 Views
I don't see how it matters, and mook's probably right anyways. - 06/09/2022 04:46:07 AM 99 Views
I do not think that would have changed things - 06/09/2022 05:30:41 PM 94 Views
Would there still be a culture war? Sure. Would whoever was Pres declare war on half of America? - 06/09/2022 06:16:57 PM 102 Views
I think an Obama or someone like Obama - 06/09/2022 08:23:36 PM 87 Views
Ummm… - 06/09/2022 06:29:20 PM 105 Views
Cain king of Substances - 06/09/2022 08:27:06 PM 90 Views
Speaking of Cain - 06/09/2022 11:20:11 PM 87 Views
Stop speaking like the 1800s - 06/09/2022 11:42:19 PM 75 Views
I would go back further, to the Cold War. - 05/09/2022 07:54:00 PM 107 Views
No one was playing a long game in the 1990s - 06/09/2022 03:35:13 PM 96 Views
This is from a publication by The Brookings Institute on China's long game. - 06/09/2022 04:20:19 PM 94 Views
Man, I thought you were finally meeting Greg and Joe in person - 06/09/2022 04:14:36 PM 99 Views
Not nearly as confused as Biden is, I dare say. - 06/09/2022 10:28:34 PM 99 Views
US politics has always been wresting in the mud. - 06/09/2022 11:22:11 PM 98 Views

Reply to Message