Active Users:1542 Time:20/08/2025 10:55:21 AM
Re: Seriously? damookster Send a noteboard - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM

View original post
View original postAnd to even suggest a lawyer provide concrete proof for information already specified as privileged is patently ridiculous. And insulting.

Assuming that Tom does indeed possess proof that the current president of the USA was personally bribed by foreign companies, you find it 'ridiculous' and 'insulting' to suggest that he should provide such proof to competent law enforcement because maybe some things are bigger than his attorney-client privilege? Is this because of your 'all politicians are corrupt so we should just let them get away with everything' theories again?



You really need to improve your reading comprehension. Let me break this down for you.

  1. I never said all politicians are so corrupt we should let them get away with everything. My point was and always has been that all politicians are corrupt so it’s naive and foolish to expect otherwise. Or claim any party is morally superior.

  2. My point about Tom is that it is ridiculous and insulting for you to state it’s impossible for you to believe him without his violating attorney client privilege and providing concrete proof. Like I replied to aerocontols, if we were debating aerospace technology and he replied, I know the answer but can’t supply it without violating security, I have no reason to doubt him. We all know that is his field and he has worked on projects that were classified. So, why should I doubt him?

Likewise with Tom. In over 20 years of interactions with him, it has become obvious he is a skilled lawyer who speaks fluent Russian and has traveled there frequently for his work. Comments he has made many times have led me to suspect he and his firm represented some involved and perhaps still do.So again, why would I doubt him? If he says he has specific knowledge that he can’t reveal because it’s privileged, I believe it. And think it’s insulting to him to imply he’s bullshitting.

And lastly, if Tom had a client who told him he bribed Joe Biden in a privileged conversation, my understanding is he is not allowed to call the FBI and report it.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon - 02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM 414 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue. - 03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM 208 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still. - 03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM 135 Views
How about this? - 04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM 136 Views
Fully agree. *NM* - 04/12/2024 06:40:15 AM 57 Views
I don't believe he'd been sentenced for those crimes, yet, had he? - 04/12/2024 07:14:04 AM 135 Views
Per 'old news', his sentencing dates were Dec 12 for the gun charge and 16 for tax evasion - 04/12/2024 01:30:11 PM 128 Views
In that case, yes, your solution is a good one. - 04/12/2024 03:58:32 PM 141 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM 145 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM 136 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric. - 04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM 191 Views
I respectfully disagree. - 04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM 125 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here. - 05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM 132 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term - 06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM 200 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes. - 06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM 149 Views
No, I mean him. *NM* - 07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM 126 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM* - 07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM 122 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President. - 08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM 201 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat. - 08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM 180 Views
Le sigh - 08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM 193 Views
Make up your mind already. - 08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM 181 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM 198 Views
Re: I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 03:49:00 PM 127 Views
I take a bit of umbrage at that assignment personally - 06/12/2024 12:37:40 AM 202 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw. - 05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM 127 Views
I know it was factually true - 06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM 207 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then? - 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM 123 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible. - 06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM 122 Views
I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM 131 Views
Re: I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM 134 Views
Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 07/12/2024 09:31:10 PM 133 Views
Re: Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 08/12/2024 03:46:54 PM 124 Views
Seriously? - 06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM 208 Views
Re: Seriously? - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM 196 Views
Did you even read that earlier post? - 07/12/2024 08:53:15 AM 189 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here - 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM 148 Views
I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM 183 Views
Re: I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 08:07:28 PM 130 Views
See my other reply above then. *NM* - 07/12/2024 09:43:37 PM 123 Views
You're CLEARLY a Harris plant - 06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM 134 Views
Hah, you got me! - 06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM 126 Views
I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:24:44 AM 138 Views
Re: I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:47:08 AM 204 Views

Reply to Message