Active Users:488 Time:13/10/2025 09:54:41 PM
Yes/Yes *NM* White Flame of Tar Valon Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 03:46:49 PM
In case anyone was wondering why I haven't posted yet to either game, I was gone for the holiday, I did NB both mods to let them know but it seemed rather pointless to post RBIRL into a post game or reg thread for a relative short and expected absence. Back in a different way too, as much fun as modding can be, the two month hiatus from play is thankfully over.

Okie-dokie, glutted full of barbecue foods and a bit exhausted, so may take a day or so rest up and catch up, hope everyone else enjoyed their holiday, or their weekend if not from a celebrant locale.

First thoughts, from my RM and skimming the initial posts, as expected we are in a crossover game. With 16 players that means good odds are we have at least 3-5 and as many as 16 settings involved. We may have many scenarios so let me kick out a few that pop to mind:

  • We've one setting for each mafia or other, and townies all come from those.

  • We've one setting for all those third party members, 'all' possibly being one person, but say it was the Gotham Asylum crowd and we had The Joker, Two Face, and the Penguin making up the 'Jester' faction.

  • Everybody's from completely different settings, e.g. Darth Vader but no Luke or Han, Rand but no Ishamael.

  • We have 2-5, probably 2-3 characters from any given setting, which may or may not include a hero and baddy each.

    Obviously lots of others, we don't know much yet, but if I had to guess, then assuming the 'Jester' remark wasn't a nod and wink at that role or a homicidal clown - e.g. The Joker or the thing from Stephen King's "It", then I'd guess two equally sized factions of 2-3 anti-town.

    Let's talk a bit about the Jester Role. First, for those not familiar this role, think of it as an Anti-Survivor Role. They aim to get lynched, winning if lynched (Not NK'd, specifically lynched) and the game usually continues after they die, you don't really bother thinking of those still in as fighting for second place, because no one gives a flying snot about the amazing strategy employed by the jester in getting themselves lynched, the jester is just an additional winner, who loses if they get NK'd or survive until the end of the game. So it saves time to ignore them as a concern entirely. If there is one, then there is one, personally I doubt there is and I've no problem lynching someone even if I think they're the Jester, it's no loss in my book, except it nominally wastes a lynch.

    Personally, I'm going to bet on two full factions, probably NK-capable with a role or two to power them up. Though one notes ranagrande didn't actually say there was a third faction, he just indicated a name for them, so let's not dig in our heels on that concept, it was a short name following a very long one, and could be a false flag, even the appearance of multiple NKs tonight won't definitely prove we're Tank-f, but for now that's the horse I'd put my bet on, with the plurality of 'Jesters' implying multiple.

    Okay, name wise the full "Ninja Pirate Zombie Robot Monkey Clowns" is a bit much and even NPZRMC is a bit much, so let's go with NPZ, or "Nipz" and Jesters.

    The odds are our Tank factions are the Nipz and Jesters and each side has 2 or 3 members, possibly 2 and 3, but IMO not likely 2-2, 4-4, or 4-2 so more likely 3-3. They may have identical makeup, which is likely to be chocolate with their group NK and likely a RBer.

    The bad news is this likely means we have 2 NKs a night coming our way, the good news is these are likely to take a toll on the rival Tank faction and not just the Town, and similiar with lynches. If it is 3-3 then we're 6/16 scummer, 37.5%, and a lynch or NK has roughly 20% chance each of whacking someone we want dead, higher if either faction has an edge hunting their rivals since they will want to exterminate them first, I know from multiple personal experience that when on the dark side nothing is more disturbing than the thought of a random SK or rival faction trying to off you come twilight and that the chance of using them to kill off townies is not really worth it for the risk involved. So come the first night, if a townie dies, 6/15 or 20% of the players will be scum and 2 NKs will be landing each with a 3 in 12 chance of hitting someone we want dead too, rising as townies die off from lynches and NKs. Ironically the town gets a positive edge as it dies off since prob-town are less likely to be NK'd while Tank factions try to eliminate each other as a greater threat, so good odds are we'll be taking this down to 5 or fewer players for victory, which means more days which means our regular night roles are stronger.

    Well, that's about all we know right now to speculate around, I'm guessing no deliberate red herrings, or very few. Let's try to gather some info, it won't help us much now but may later, but first some reminders:

    1. You lie, you die - Success is its own excuse, we won't auto-lynch someone who has clearly lied to the town's benefit, but I fully plan to vote for anyone who does without a A+ excuse and will likely vote for them even then.

    2. Don't RC, even truthfully, early unless you've been pressed, we don't need four or five people claiming vanilla to protect their necks from NK and lynch at the heightened odds of losing our cops, docs, etc. So with that in mind, please don't volunteer extra info to these questions unless you think it will aid the cause, and that's the 'Town wins' cause, not the 'I, personally, don't get lynched or NK'd' cause.

    Questions - Please Respond Yes, No, Uncertain (UNC), Won't Answer Currently (WUC)

    a) Are you from a setting that primarily revolves around Modern Earth, such that very little setting background is needed for an audience?

    Examples:
    I am from Twilight - Yes
    I am from James Patterson's Alex Cross Detective Series - Yes
    I am from DC Comics Batman/Superman - Yes

    I am from Star Wars - No
    I am from Wheel of Time - No
    I am from Lord of the Rings - No

    I am from Bram Stroker's Dracula - Uncertain (UNC)
    I am from a cyberpunk series - UNC
    I am from Dr. Who, but am a modern earth sidekick - UNC

    b) Are you a relatively major character from a relatively well-known series?

    Examples:
    Superman - Yes
    Batman - Yes
    Gandalf - Yes
    Darth Vader - Yes
    Captain Kirk - Yes

    Aquaman - UNC
    Dr. Strange - UNC
    Captain Janeway - UNC
    The Borg from Star Trek - UNC

    Breeze or Ham from Mistborn - No
    Sate Pestage or Admiral Thrawn from Star Wars Extended Universe - No
    Doomsday from Superman - No
    Sammael from Wheel of Time - No

    In other words, just saying the name without context is likely get recognition from most random people, then yes, saying the name with context "Robert Smith from the Cure" is likely to get a response from many people or a definite and immediate yes from anyone with an above average familiarity with the series, and saying the name with context is likely to get a blank stare form most people and maybe even a delay from fans of said series without context, e.g. me just saying Breeze or Ham outside of mentioning Mistborn is unlikely to even gain note from solid fans of the series, but in context most readers will remember immediately or need only a little prodding like "Sammael, the Forsaken from Wheel of Time" Don't worry about the relative popularity of the series, unless it's huge like Star Wars or Harry Potter.

    Okay, again, truthful answers only please, my own are UNC and UNC for both so don't be too leery of using those, this second question isn't much of a lie detector question, people could be entirely truthful and give three different answer for say, Admiral Ackbar, but if you're Han Solo you should be answering No to a) and Yes to b)
  • Reply to message
    RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM 4753 Views
    Miscellaneous information - 30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM 1634 Views
    Epic Intro *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:26:49 AM 1004 Views
    Thanks *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:00:59 AM 957 Views
    Re: Miscellaneous information - 31/05/2010 04:38:35 AM 1623 Views
    What. - 31/05/2010 02:30:11 AM 1658 Views
    Re: What. - 31/05/2010 03:01:21 AM 1712 Views
    Or maybe he just wants us to think that ... - 31/05/2010 04:08:54 AM 1626 Views
    RAFO *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:01:26 AM 968 Views
    Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM 1655 Views
    I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head - 31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM 1540 Views
    You don't need to get all the references to play though - 31/05/2010 07:31:32 AM 1513 Views
    Don't forget the 5th element *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM 1032 Views
    and the adam's family *NM* - 31/05/2010 03:26:23 PM 1003 Views
    African Rabies is World War Z. Also- DEATH UNICORN!!!! - 31/05/2010 06:06:47 PM 1635 Views
    Okay, so, let's get this started. - 31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM 1655 Views
    yes and yes *NM* - 31/05/2010 12:24:19 PM 986 Views
    Yes and Yes. Do you? *NM* - 31/05/2010 01:03:04 PM 992 Views
    Yes I do. *NM* - 31/05/2010 07:42:15 PM 1012 Views
    Indeedy. *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:48:49 PM 963 Views
    Yessir *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:59:06 PM 971 Views
    Yup *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:41 PM 889 Views
    Well that depends. - 31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM 1482 Views
    Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character. - 31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM 1547 Views
    Yeah, that's weird - 31/05/2010 08:02:09 PM 1511 Views
    I went with Wikipedia, actually . - 31/05/2010 08:11:31 PM 1668 Views
    I do...(for both) - 31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM 1758 Views
    I would be willing to bet that's true. - 31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM 1593 Views
    So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists? - 31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM 1537 Views
    EBWOP - 31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM 1540 Views
    I think the "Zombie" comes from the African Rabies reference - 31/05/2010 09:42:31 PM 1590 Views
    That's a good point. - 31/05/2010 10:09:29 PM 1580 Views
    Maybe whoever dies becomes a zombie - 02/06/2010 01:57:59 AM 1590 Views
    What's in a name? - 01/06/2010 03:09:24 AM 1527 Views
    Clever - 01/06/2010 03:37:55 AM 1413 Views
    No idea. *NM* - 31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM 959 Views
    Does that mean you're just not sure of who you are - 01/06/2010 12:51:17 AM 1447 Views
    *looks shamefully down* - 01/06/2010 07:22:16 AM 1649 Views
    Yeargh! *NM* - 31/05/2010 11:59:28 PM 960 Views
    Yes to both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM 1008 Views
    Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM 871 Views
    I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM 930 Views
    Oh. Then yeah. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:48:21 AM 1103 Views
    Yeah...i got both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 02:57:56 AM 955 Views
    yeps. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:35:56 AM 892 Views
    Oh, and I nearly forgot ... - 31/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1584 Views
    WOOOOOOOO *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:54 PM 993 Views
    If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM 927 Views
    +1 - 31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM 1595 Views
    +1 to that song. *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM 964 Views
    thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:48:53 PM 947 Views
    Re: thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:49:52 PM 959 Views
    people would die of hilarity. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:03:07 AM 1008 Views
    Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?) - 01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM 1452 Views
    ummm, dear? - 01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM 1493 Views
    Actually, there is. *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:27:46 AM 977 Views
    fudgemuffins *NM* - 01/06/2010 04:02:28 PM 880 Views
    Are the election rules the same? And the 96 hour deadline? - 02/06/2010 01:08:06 AM 1414 Views
    It's announced in the Miscellaneous information - 01/06/2010 03:17:06 PM 1456 Views
    ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM 1447 Views
    Re: ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 02/06/2010 01:12:59 AM 1544 Views
    At least I got the discussion going. *NM* - 02/06/2010 05:58:58 PM 919 Views
    You know what? - 02/06/2010 06:11:16 PM 1586 Views
    Two can play at that game! - 03/06/2010 01:58:09 AM 1449 Views
    Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM 1440 Views
    Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM 1705 Views
    Re: Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:42:17 PM 1522 Views
    UNC UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:35:11 PM 977 Views
    Yes & UNC - 02/06/2010 02:14:48 AM 1629 Views
    No and yes. - 02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM 1508 Views
    OMGUS Vote: Napoleon62 *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:40:52 AM 973 Views
    Random stone throwing super dick vote - 02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM 1524 Views
    ranagrande has been lynched - 02/06/2010 09:30:53 PM 1530 Views
    ROFL - 02/06/2010 09:47:48 PM 1600 Views
    Hahaha - 03/06/2010 02:08:29 AM 1560 Views
    UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:05:25 PM 1552 Views
    Re: UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:17:14 PM 1526 Views
    UNC and NO *NM* - 03/06/2010 01:56:35 AM 923 Views
    a) Kinda - Yes/UNC. B) UNC. - 01/06/2010 10:54:32 PM 1559 Views
    Re: Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 11:03:00 PM 1610 Views
    UNC/UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:42:21 PM 1021 Views
    Yes and unable to judge - UNC *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:22:33 AM 938 Views
    Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague - 02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM 1415 Views
    So... many... acronyms... - 02/06/2010 01:51:46 AM 1468 Views
    Nipz makes me think of Cheese Nips. - 03/06/2010 01:55:20 AM 1542 Views
    Yes and yes. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:55:07 AM 957 Views
    Yes/Yes *NM* - 02/06/2010 03:46:49 PM 961 Views
    UNC and UNC *NM* - 03/06/2010 04:36:55 PM 865 Views
    OK, so we all know who we are. Now what? - 02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM 1539 Views
    We seem to have two random votes already - 02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM 1376 Views
    You mean Napoleon and Isaac? - 03/06/2010 03:07:14 AM 1557 Views
    Still, it's a start - 03/06/2010 06:40:16 PM 1496 Views
    What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM 1476 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 01:01:52 AM 1521 Views
    I won't be participating in that. - 03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM 1404 Views
    That's pretty legit. - 03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM 1527 Views
    We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM* - 03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM 932 Views
    You think there are ulterior motives? - 03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM 1455 Views
    *confused* Aren't there always? *NM* - 03/06/2010 03:09:49 AM 982 Views
    Not really in this case - 03/06/2010 04:46:02 AM 1442 Views
    It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:11:00 AM 1483 Views
    Re: It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:14:48 AM 1403 Views
    Fair enough. Good reason not to. - 03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM 1490 Views
    I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification - 03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM 1502 Views
    I remember that. - 03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM 1423 Views
    Okay, so next 'question' - 03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM 1565 Views
    Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here. - 03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM 1458 Views
    But if you're from something really weird - 03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM 1539 Views
    You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things - 03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM 1615 Views
    Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question? - 06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM 1616 Views
    No, they were examples - 07/06/2010 12:14:03 AM 1369 Views
    Yeah, I'm still not doing it. - 03/06/2010 06:59:26 PM 1601 Views
    yeesh! - 03/06/2010 09:36:33 AM 1478 Views
    Re: yeesh! - 03/06/2010 10:41:58 AM 1465 Views
    Alright, I'll do it you fraidy catz - 03/06/2010 09:23:58 PM 1538 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 04:28:44 AM 1499 Views
    IMPORTANT POINT - 04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM 1480 Views
    That's a good point - 04/06/2010 05:28:39 AM 1493 Views
    Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM 1589 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM 1537 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM 1508 Views
    It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM 1454 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM 1571 Views
    Oh, BTW Isaac: you didn't update for my answer in your Table - 04/06/2010 09:01:00 AM 1502 Views
    Wow, that's a weird one - 04/06/2010 09:44:23 AM 1409 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 03:41:43 PM 1575 Views
    I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers - 04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM 1431 Views
    jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM 1490 Views
    Re: jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:37:34 PM 1465 Views
    okies thanks *NM* - 05/06/2010 03:56:31 AM 904 Views
    Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans. - 04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM 1523 Views
    I must be really tired. - 05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM 1438 Views
    Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series - 05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM 1395 Views
    or to kill? - 05/06/2010 04:05:53 AM 1476 Views
    Re: or to kill? - 05/06/2010 08:18:25 AM 1492 Views
    EBWOP: programmed, not programmer *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:21:00 AM 952 Views
    Ohhhh ok, so you assumed he was roled, not that he wa a Doc - 05/06/2010 07:37:36 PM 1564 Views
    Out of curiosity, what did he say? - 05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM 1589 Views
    He said he was programmed. - 05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM 1503 Views
    But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed? - 05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM 1586 Views
    Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's - 05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM 1581 Views
    Yup, it was the same. *NM* - 05/06/2010 10:11:22 PM 902 Views
    Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM* - 04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM 923 Views
    Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not? - 04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM 1601 Views
    It'll get us info. - 04/06/2010 08:27:20 PM 1575 Views
    Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM 1399 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 08:25:38 AM 1552 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM 1448 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 10:31:21 AM 1557 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 12:23:35 PM 1410 Views
    I think we should do this. - 05/06/2010 01:21:18 AM 1492 Views
    im definalty a man *NM* - 06/06/2010 09:07:47 PM 875 Views
    btw, what happened to the Chair election? - 04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM 1458 Views
    Artsapat has been elected Chair. - 05/06/2010 12:39:05 AM 1486 Views
    OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th* - 06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM 1538 Views
    BlackAdder - M *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:00:38 PM 920 Views
    Isaac - M (a note on gender) - 06/06/2010 11:01:55 PM 1442 Views
    I'm a dude. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:04:11 AM 966 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:42:34 AM 886 Views
    I am female - 07/06/2010 03:11:45 AM 1474 Views
    Male. *NM* - 07/06/2010 04:52:39 AM 902 Views
    I must have been REALLY tired not having seen this yesterday - 07/06/2010 08:00:23 AM 1468 Views
    Male. . . .again. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM 905 Views
    Napoleon's going to have a hard time - 07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM 1510 Views
    Let's not. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM 906 Views
    I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM 877 Views
    Don't worry, Bro. We can have girl talk together *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:44:32 PM 992 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 10:26:37 AM 920 Views
    Female. *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:21:11 PM 874 Views
    I'm all MAN!!!!! - 07/06/2010 02:04:55 PM 1534 Views
    I am a manly man! *NM* - 07/06/2010 11:57:48 PM 852 Views
    Male *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:22:47 AM 948 Views
    Male *NM* - 09/06/2010 12:19:46 AM 886 Views
    Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM 1406 Views
    Uh - 07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM 1540 Views
    Re: Uh - 07/06/2010 03:20:53 AM 1566 Views
    Yeah, I don't get it either. - 07/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 1408 Views
    Can someone explain for the slow kids? - 08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM 1431 Views
    Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page - 08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM 1601 Views
    Basically - 08/06/2010 11:16:26 PM 1590 Views
    Hmm... - 07/06/2010 10:49:12 AM 1495 Views
    Mine - 07/06/2010 01:54:06 PM 1547 Views
    Soooo yeah..... - 07/06/2010 02:03:19 PM 1537 Views
    Hm. Alright. - 07/06/2010 07:15:16 PM 1527 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 08:56:30 PM 1490 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 11:42:27 PM 1462 Views
    Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings? - 08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM 1510 Views
    Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM 893 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 08/06/2010 03:42:52 AM 1521 Views
    The responses of me - 09/06/2010 02:03:08 AM 1544 Views
    Mine. - 09/06/2010 08:07:17 PM 1511 Views
    Two new thoughts - 08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM 1531 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM 1595 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM 1514 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 05:03:10 AM 1438 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:11:51 PM 1486 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM 1539 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM 1380 Views
    Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM* - 09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM 901 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:00:28 PM 1568 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 03:26:16 AM 1554 Views
    Oops. - 09/06/2010 12:28:25 AM 1727 Views
    Whoa, how are we dead already? - 09/06/2010 03:28:53 AM 1471 Views
    There are still like 5 people left who haven't claimed settings - 09/06/2010 04:19:38 AM 1468 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM 1519 Views
    Not sure about the Talic vote, but - 09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM 1505 Views
    Agree - 09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM 1530 Views
    Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM 1558 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM 1491 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM 1564 Views
    Eh. Let's just lynch Talic. - 09/06/2010 11:23:16 PM 1500 Views
    Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad - 10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM 1526 Views
    Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM* - 10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM 997 Views
    I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late - 10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM 1468 Views
    Incidentally... - 10/06/2010 04:24:23 AM 1431 Views
    Agreed. - 10/06/2010 04:31:26 AM 1446 Views
    But even if that happens - 10/06/2010 07:37:45 AM 1475 Views
    Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM 1495 Views
    Thank you. - 10/06/2010 04:30:23 AM 1518 Views
    Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM 1640 Views
    Re: Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:53:22 AM 1495 Views
    Totally. *NM* - 10/06/2010 04:57:57 AM 944 Views
    Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM 1523 Views
    We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction - 10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM 1531 Views
    Yeah, but that isn't a voting record. - 11/06/2010 04:41:29 AM 1582 Views
    I don't believe in completely random lynches. - 10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM 1575 Views
    I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide. - 10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM 1548 Views
    'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie - 10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM 1454 Views
    Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM 1473 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM 1586 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM 1562 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:18:56 AM 1466 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:35:14 AM 1627 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM 1550 Views
    Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend? - 11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM 1583 Views
    Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM 1580 Views
    Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM 1602 Views
    I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM 1549 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:48:31 AM 1516 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 04:08:27 AM 1380 Views
    Well actually technically I am kinda new. *NM* - 12/06/2010 01:22:50 PM 915 Views
    Whoa, did I put Dark Shadows? - 09/06/2010 06:22:16 PM 1552 Views
    Yeaaah, I don't think so. - 09/06/2010 08:13:41 PM 1433 Views
    Update! Darth Katie's analysis: - 09/06/2010 11:20:36 PM 1537 Views
    So sorry guys - 10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM 1530 Views
    It happens, don't worry about it - 10/06/2010 06:35:25 AM 1584 Views
    No problem - 10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM 1593 Views
    Any chance we can get Gher to replace in? - 10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM 1716 Views
    That would be great if he wanted to - 10/06/2010 08:46:55 PM 1546 Views
    Actually... - 10/06/2010 08:52:19 PM 1496 Views
    An addition to my Talic accusation - 10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM 1543 Views
    Duffman wouldn't be awesome? - 10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM 1524 Views
    It was mostly a "slightly better than random" vote - 10/06/2010 04:42:38 PM 1422 Views
    Well, it did raise a good point for approach though - 11/06/2010 01:05:18 AM 1532 Views
    Oh come on. - 10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM 1583 Views
    I maintain it made sense - 11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM 1494 Views
    Heading rival Darkfriend factions would've been awesome. - 11/06/2010 03:02:35 AM 1445 Views
    Definitely - 11/06/2010 03:20:38 AM 1517 Views
    Re: Oh come on. - 12/06/2010 01:56:41 PM 1436 Views
    oh why so serious beet? - 10/06/2010 09:11:03 PM 1487 Views
    ...just watch? - 10/06/2010 11:15:20 PM 1656 Views
    Combined Info (Table) - 11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM 1592 Views
    The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM 1459 Views
    Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM 1474 Views
    Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM 1540 Views
    Works for me. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:19:45 PM 887 Views
    Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM 1615 Views
    You have an acronym fetish, don't you? *NM* - 11/06/2010 09:02:07 AM 986 Views
    You know, just because someone is good or bad in their series, - 11/06/2010 05:35:04 AM 1542 Views
    Yep, but the individual character will control that I think - 11/06/2010 05:42:28 AM 1563 Views
    RBIRL for the weekend *NM* - 11/06/2010 12:51:17 PM 884 Views
    Me too basically. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:24:38 PM 903 Views
    [realy busy in real life] - 12/06/2010 12:41:46 PM 1488 Views
    RBIRL for another effing week. - 13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM 1506 Views
    I'm RBIRL this week as well, through Friday. *NM* - 13/06/2010 06:40:04 AM 932 Views
    I am forced to assume - 13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM 1496 Views
    Oh, and I am semi-RBIRL until Friday too. *NM* - 13/06/2010 03:00:47 PM 916 Views
    Re: I am forced to assume - 15/06/2010 06:44:06 AM 1567 Views
    Well good luck with that too, I guess. - 15/06/2010 10:29:19 PM 1448 Views
    I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM 1434 Views
    Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM 1461 Views
    Why Isaac? *NM* - 13/06/2010 02:47:49 PM 928 Views
    I too, unsurprisingly, would like an answer to that *NM* - 13/06/2010 05:48:29 PM 896 Views
    Good point. - 13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM 1495 Views
    Eh, do we ever get that much out of Day One? - 13/06/2010 06:46:31 PM 1652 Views
    Kinda. - 13/06/2010 09:16:56 PM 1542 Views
    Actually it's often the most productive day - 13/06/2010 09:26:25 PM 1489 Views
    Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week... - 13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM 1588 Views
    Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM 1764 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 06:50:19 PM 1488 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 10:27:43 PM 1504 Views
    EBWOP - 15/06/2010 12:59:20 AM 1806 Views
    Yes it's just day 1 - 15/06/2010 01:06:56 AM 1518 Views
    Pledge: No; CON: Sure - 15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM 1566 Views
    So... - 15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM 1520 Views
    If you will allow me to be pedantic. - 15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM 1392 Views
    Duly noted - 15/06/2010 01:38:34 AM 1442 Views
    Not like they were especially contributive anyway. - 15/06/2010 02:26:34 AM 1438 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 02:29:41 AM 1519 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 07:52:29 AM 1414 Views
    Re: So... - 16/06/2010 06:36:22 PM 1607 Views
    I think scum might be willing to ask some questions. - 15/06/2010 01:43:57 AM 1464 Views
    Yes, they do - 15/06/2010 02:32:57 AM 1476 Views
    The pledge I am not very enthused about. - 15/06/2010 01:42:27 AM 1525 Views
    Ok, I just want to say I'm sorry for not posting as much as I normally do - 15/06/2010 02:52:31 AM 1349 Views
    Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms. - 15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM 1512 Views
    Also... - 15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM 1561 Views
    Well, the role itself is something you would not expect. - 15/06/2010 03:36:33 PM 1613 Views
    That's an ambiguous but tantalizing statement... - 15/06/2010 03:59:29 PM 1623 Views
    my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 10:04:51 AM 1511 Views
    Re: my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 03:23:10 PM 1580 Views
    Do you have a suggestion? *NM* - 15/06/2010 06:10:25 PM 897 Views
    On that note... - 16/06/2010 07:02:12 PM 1603 Views
    Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM 1449 Views
    Re: Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 04:21:56 PM 1535 Views
    Every vanilla is supposed to say yes. - 15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM 1562 Views
    Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say. - 15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM 1492 Views
    Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind - 15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM 1474 Views
    Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM* - 15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM 1025 Views
    Let me run another possible question by you - 15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM 1504 Views
    By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question - 15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM 1359 Views
    At first glance, I don't see any problem with it. - 15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM 1547 Views
    Let's go with it then - 15/06/2010 09:42:32 PM 1564 Views
    Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:28:10 PM 1455 Views
    Re: Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:45:37 PM 1426 Views
    Ok so I really don't like the idea of the pledge - 15/06/2010 04:27:09 PM 1518 Views
    DFs might try to skate through. - 15/06/2010 10:57:06 PM 1600 Views
    Actually Gender was mine... *NM* - 16/06/2010 06:31:02 PM 867 Views
    Also, yes to con, no to pledge. *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:03:42 PM 938 Views
    The Big Info Compilation v 1.0 (Table) - 14/06/2010 07:40:38 PM 1686 Views
    to get the game moving - 15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM 1570 Views
    go on... *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM 947 Views
    its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM 950 Views
    It is customary *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM 956 Views
    well... - 15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM 1478 Views
    Eh, I think I've been pretty consistent - 16/06/2010 06:35:57 AM 1451 Views
    Yeah, I was a bit wary of the way he leapt on Talic too. - 16/06/2010 12:51:30 PM 1548 Views
    I actually would think it proves his innocence over anything - 17/06/2010 12:18:04 AM 1610 Views
    Next Question - 15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM 1471 Views
    Seriously - 15/06/2010 10:58:24 PM 1552 Views
    I am willing to answer if others are willing though *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:58:44 PM 927 Views
    It's interesting, actually. - 16/06/2010 06:37:41 AM 1576 Views
    Debatable. - 15/06/2010 11:00:39 PM 1543 Views
    Strong Yes - 16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM 1527 Views
    Didn't you already say you were a manly man? - 16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM 1520 Views
    Well, he could also be a 'neither' or 'both'. *NM* - 16/06/2010 05:24:26 PM 961 Views
    I am large; I contain multitudes - 16/06/2010 07:48:33 PM 1606 Views
    HGD- No *NM* - 16/06/2010 12:11:28 PM 851 Views
    I find the HDG question vague and polarizing... *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:04:59 PM 948 Views
    HDG- yes - 17/06/2010 11:23:18 PM 1514 Views
    Who isn't answering questions (Table) - 17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM 1461 Views
    oi! - 17/06/2010 07:43:23 PM 1548 Views
    Gotcha, fixed it - 17/06/2010 07:50:53 PM 1416 Views
    Throw in an oi for me, too - 17/06/2010 11:22:48 PM 1524 Views
    One of my answers - 18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM 1466 Views
    It won't be too much longer - 18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM 1415 Views
    Agreed - 18/06/2010 06:39:35 PM 1466 Views
    "It" being my own notes etc, off course *NM* - 18/06/2010 06:42:42 PM 925 Views
    Re: Agreed - 18/06/2010 08:02:02 PM 1700 Views
    Fox is RBIRL until after this weekend - 18/06/2010 10:06:26 PM 1734 Views
    HDG: Plead the 5th - 19/06/2010 09:49:08 AM 1579 Views
    No longer RBIRL and will be what I mostly skimmed over in a bit - 19/06/2010 10:00:12 AM 1427 Views
    Technical difficulties... back to RBIRL until fixed *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:28:41 AM 902 Views
    All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM 1460 Views
    why just FOS? - 19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM 1449 Views
    EBWOP Vote Artsapat - 19/06/2010 09:51:01 PM 1468 Views
    I can't vote for two people at once - 19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM 1425 Views
    Honestly, I'm in standby at this point. - 20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM 1505 Views
    Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version - 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM 1477 Views
    Hah, nice, thanks - 20/06/2010 05:24:15 PM 1512 Views
    Welcome *NM* - 20/06/2010 05:24:57 PM 904 Views
    Interesting. - 20/06/2010 01:41:40 AM 1639 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 03:43:46 AM 1553 Views
    Okay, admittedly, I haven't been paying that much attention. - 20/06/2010 05:55:51 AM 1502 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM 1557 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 05:47:45 PM 1474 Views
    I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM 1520 Views
    Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM 1448 Views
    I just wanted a one word thingy, so people could type it easy - 20/06/2010 08:15:57 PM 1639 Views
    No Comment *NM* - 22/06/2010 11:34:42 PM 891 Views
    Let me extend you an offer - 20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM 1587 Views
    A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How? - 21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM 1579 Views
    No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so - 21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM 1579 Views
    I thought I did address the accusation. - 21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM 1478 Views
    See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest - 21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM 1644 Views
    I'm not really interested in typos one way or another - 21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM 1571 Views
    I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. - 21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM 1548 Views
    And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning. - 21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM 1500 Views
    Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM 1459 Views
    Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM 1544 Views
    MRE seems to be giving a lot of people trouble *NM* - 21/06/2010 05:40:57 PM 932 Views
    Maybe ask the question again and try to get confirmation? *NM* - 21/06/2010 06:47:51 PM 887 Views
    I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie - 21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM 1514 Views
    For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes. - 21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM 1508 Views
    Possible, and MCS? - 21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM 1497 Views
    Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM 1450 Views
    Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM 1491 Views
    Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin - 21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM 1541 Views
    I'd like a roleclaim. - 22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM 1511 Views
    Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes. - 22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM 1549 Views
    Oh, and don't forget about Arty. - 22/06/2010 01:21:49 AM 1537 Views
    Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM* - 22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM 933 Views
    Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me. - 21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM 1468 Views
    Might as well explain my answers then. - 21/06/2010 08:52:46 AM 1567 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 06:37:50 PM 1512 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 21/06/2010 07:57:59 AM 1593 Views
    Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way - 20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM 1546 Views
    Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM 1500 Views
    Now, I'm all in favor of lynching Isaac. - 22/06/2010 01:37:37 AM 1593 Views
    "You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day. - 22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM 1466 Views
    Vote: Artsapat - 22/06/2010 05:01:31 AM 1396 Views
    Hey, that's a good idea. Vote: Artsapat *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:18:21 AM 895 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM 1458 Views
    I suppose I'll join in - 22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM 1520 Views
    I'm not gonna deny that I deserve this. - 22/06/2010 03:24:38 AM 1471 Views
    - 22/06/2010 03:52:33 AM 1501 Views
    Oh man, that was hilarious. - 22/06/2010 03:54:58 AM 1457 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM 1450 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM 1478 Views
    Yea! Kill Kronin! - 22/06/2010 04:56:58 AM 1471 Views
    No offense meant, bro. *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:45:22 PM 904 Views
    My answers to the 2 questions asked... - 20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM 1447 Views
    Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 05:57:00 PM 1444 Views
    Re: Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 06:42:38 PM 1478 Views
    Vote Table - 21/06/2010 08:51:45 PM 1428 Views
    Well, I suppose the sensible thing to do here is lynch Kronin. - 22/06/2010 04:08:46 AM 1422 Views
    I told you, main character was my bad. - 22/06/2010 04:20:08 AM 1408 Views
    OK, I'll hammer this - 22/06/2010 07:29:38 AM 1407 Views
    Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched - 22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM 1537 Views
    a slight delay - 25/06/2010 05:55:03 AM 1485 Views
    Re: a slight delay - 25/06/2010 07:28:21 AM 1481 Views
    No worries, take your time - 25/06/2010 02:02:58 PM 1461 Views

    Reply to Message