Explanation:

basically I can't kill unless the ninjas try and fail. (For instancew if they're thwarted by the doctor) So, no, I can't do it right now. That was one of the first things I NBd FT about when we got this whole skip the night thing. I thought I might be able to. But since all the roles are suspended from it, that means mine was too.


Other things:

On the topic of innocence, I've been assuming Yuna was innocent because she got the doc role. (And I was relieved that the doctor was still alive because it means a chance I might get to use my role at some point still.) But if it was something given after, then it's not connected to her alignment, is it?

That said, it's not enough to make me think that Yuna is guilty. she has shown nothing I can think of that would make me feel that way. But I think we do have to rethink the idea that certain roles are town and certain roles are scum.

However, I do agree that the ninjas would have finagled to get at least one of their members on the treasure hunt. (Unless of course, they're all playing the way Fox seems to be. Which, in that case, is just sad.) On that dint I *would* suspect Yuna, and of course ?.

As for Kronin, I was willing to take his "stumble" as an honest word mistake but the two separate events of Fox saying he'd done the same when the rest say he was scum in that game and of Fox being scum in this game and defending Kronin are slightly overwhelming.

Other than that, the thing I'm still bugged about is the massclaim. I feel a bit like it has painted a bullseye on my back. And I resent and feel betrayed by the fact that this idea of Isaac's wasn't really to help the town as much as it was to help himself. He suggested it because it ties in directly with his role and gives *him* the information he needs to work but it puts the rest of us in a certain amount of danger because the ninjas know who *isn't* bulletproof. And now they know who the doctor is and can probably, by dint of having played with the same people so many times, guess who they would protect.

Other than that, if we must lose someone and do not know who it should be, perhaps we need to think on who we could suffer the least by losing. Cuz I'm fairly sure I'm not the only confused one.