Active Users:490 Time:03/03/2026 11:51:20 AM
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.


Not exactly, when we reference 'expanding universe' we actually mean two different types of expansion. The Observable Universe os actually just a normal sphere some 90 billion light years across centered on Earth, this is expanding, Hubble and all, but we can only see as far as time allows... this would tend to make people think a sphere around Earth some 13.7 billion light years in radius but it's bigger than that since the observable radius is the distance that light could cover in that time, the objects moving away from each other and all. Common misconception, yes, the Universe, observable and otherwise is expanding, but totally seperate from that, the distance we can see is expanding, so a galaxy currently right outside the observable universe would eventually become visible too. It is possible there is nothing beyond the visible but this requires an violation of the Copernican Principle so that the Earth really is the center of the Universe in 3-space, obviously fairly unlikely, but more over, recent models put the actual Universe's size, in relation to the Observable Universe, at many times large, as much as 10^23 times larger.

I also feel obliged to point out that 136x2^256 might be better utilized for play purposes as a constant, which I shall name "COIN" where 1 coin is equal to approximately 0.001x136x2^256, and thus for game play purposes we would have 1000 of these "COINs" :P

That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little. :P


Truem but if you start working with anything more than 5-10 digits the ones after that are basically meaningless, people will just bet in scientific notation, and I'd guess the significant digits won't exceed telephone number length, like all 1.234567x10^big and such, might as well shave off the x10^big, I'm in regardless but in terms of boat rocking you'd almost be better off placing bids in hexidecimal or using low millions or something, IMHO

I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.


Probably a painfully large spreadsheet on your behalf and confusion over used notation, I'd advise letting people use E# calculator style for base ten, like a 5,000,000= 5E6 or 6,789,000,000 equal 6.789E9 and such

But yeah, I'm in

Welcome :)
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Coin Game V - 30/11/2010 11:45:31 PM 2959 Views
I'm a little confused(as usual) - 30/11/2010 11:50:06 PM 1588 Views
It's the same basic system as before. You'll just have a few more coins to play with. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:39 AM 852 Views
Oh ok cool stuff. *NM* - 02/12/2010 12:28:43 AM 861 Views
I object to your outdated usage of proton count - 01/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1615 Views
I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM 1752 Views
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM 1869 Views
People are free to submit their entries in any format they desire - 01/12/2010 02:40:21 AM 1699 Views
Hoo boy, this is going to be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:59:30 AM 886 Views
whole real numbers only? *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:41:19 AM 908 Views
Ah, thanks, that does need some clarification - 01/12/2010 04:08:33 AM 1517 Views
So if I bet negative, assuming I'm not the lowest, do I earn coins? - 01/12/2010 04:23:11 AM 1607 Views
Thanks for pointing out the necessity for another rule! - 01/12/2010 04:34:43 AM 1689 Views
*NM* - 01/12/2010 04:37:16 AM 905 Views
Ooh, interesting... I'm in *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:44 AM 963 Views
Yes, I shall play - 01/12/2010 01:30:11 AM 1558 Views
I'm in. This will definitely be interesting. - 01/12/2010 01:38:04 AM 1565 Views
Yes'm *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:27:26 AM 966 Views
I am totally in for this. - 01/12/2010 03:37:43 AM 1603 Views
I'll do it. This could be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 06:15:48 AM 919 Views
I think I need to join this game. - 01/12/2010 06:44:18 AM 1484 Views
Let's begin Round 1! - 02/12/2010 01:19:33 PM 1633 Views
Round 2! - 04/12/2010 05:30:41 PM 1731 Views
lol *NM* - 04/12/2010 05:58:16 PM 1069 Views
Ha ha, awesome - 04/12/2010 07:28:30 PM 1593 Views
I had no idea what I was doing and I won!! AHAHAHAHhehehehehe.... *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:44:35 PM 963 Views
- 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM 1538 Views
Against a force such as this, there can be no victory. *NM* - 05/12/2010 06:30:15 AM 886 Views
*NM* - 05/12/2010 07:09:41 AM 944 Views
Of course not... - 05/12/2010 07:22:41 AM 1732 Views
We must join with him. It would be wise, my friend. *NM* - 05/12/2010 07:38:53 AM 933 Views
Tell me, friend, when did you abandon reason for madness?? *NM* - 05/12/2010 02:45:35 PM 885 Views
Who me? Or are you asking BA?? *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:22:51 AM 858 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 03:11:19 AM 888 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 10:11:12 PM 870 Views
It's a scene from Lord of the Rings! - 07/12/2010 03:06:28 PM 1557 Views
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way of pain. *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:59:35 AM 911 Views
Nooooo! - 07/12/2010 03:35:21 AM 1607 Views
Yes, I did not expect you to show wisdom, even on your own behalf; - 07/12/2010 06:48:17 PM 1416 Views
I am ashamed to admit I cannot produce the appropriate response to this. - 07/12/2010 08:05:27 PM 1556 Views
That's fine. - 08/12/2010 03:26:23 AM 1540 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2010 04:00:20 AM 858 Views
So, a serious question about my nerd-cred. - 08/12/2010 06:00:05 AM 1583 Views
MORE of a nerd. - 08/12/2010 01:50:47 PM 1591 Views
MUCH more. HILARIOUSLY more. - 08/12/2010 03:35:47 PM 1763 Views
Round 3! - 06/12/2010 07:48:56 PM 1655 Views
Dangit! I had my bid planned, but forgot to submit it. *NM* - 06/12/2010 07:54:15 PM 936 Views
Kronin's bid was gibberish and higher too - 06/12/2010 09:13:08 PM 1748 Views
I of course meant them all in their most popular incarnations. *NM* - 07/12/2010 04:44:02 AM 910 Views
Actually, they combine fairly easily. - 08/12/2010 01:22:08 PM 1525 Views
This is absurd. *NM* - 06/12/2010 09:59:55 PM 851 Views
This post does not belong here. *NM* - 08/12/2010 10:17:37 PM 851 Views
Round 4! - 09/12/2010 02:12:20 AM 1746 Views
Yes, I am lucking out majorly! - 09/12/2010 02:42:34 AM 1531 Views
Round 5! - 10/12/2010 03:34:00 PM 1704 Views
Round 6! - 12/12/2010 08:14:21 PM 1581 Views
Wow, completely forgot *NM* - 13/12/2010 10:45:45 AM 928 Views
Round 7! - 15/12/2010 05:13:52 AM 1609 Views
Way to be a jerk, Gher. *NM* - 15/12/2010 05:19:15 AM 878 Views
I thought it was easy enough to work with. A jerk would put down a equation... - 15/12/2010 04:10:52 PM 1414 Views
I don't mind either way. - 16/12/2010 04:03:43 AM 1873 Views
Shoot I totally forgot about this game... *NM* - 15/12/2010 09:47:55 PM 848 Views
The End - 18/12/2010 07:07:18 PM 1694 Views
I knew this was going to happen *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:46:58 PM 799 Views
I was expecting second place again, the win's nice *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:52:40 PM 850 Views
Oh, that's right, so did I. - 19/12/2010 06:42:10 AM 1457 Views
Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 03:30:03 PM 1503 Views
Re: Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 10:34:49 PM 1632 Views
D'oh! - 19/12/2010 05:19:32 AM 1454 Views

Reply to Message