It's essentially the same as when you were 'confirming' people to be vanilla townies when they used the term 'villager' in Game 2. You may recall, I was not a villager - I was a Yellow Ajah Aes Sedai - and yet through reading the opening post and your discussion with... why was it, CarnCarn? I deduced that was the keyword you were using and used it myself deliberately to demonstrate how the techniques was unfounded.
In this case, it is quite easily deduced from the opening post, and we (or I, anyway) don't even know what the Shadow roles' message contains - if it says, say 'you are against the Tower', it's quite easy to say what you just did. Nor does knowing this actually confirm anything. My role certainly did not contain the words 'You are for the Tower' or anything like it, though it is easily understood to be that way from the text.
In this case, it is quite easily deduced from the opening post, and we (or I, anyway) don't even know what the Shadow roles' message contains - if it says, say 'you are against the Tower', it's quite easy to say what you just did. Nor does knowing this actually confirm anything. My role certainly did not contain the words 'You are for the Tower' or anything like it, though it is easily understood to be that way from the text.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Mafia Day one
- 30/08/2009 10:53:04 AM
3188 Views
Vote tally
- 30/08/2009 11:10:18 AM
1792 Views
Tee hee hee.
- 30/08/2009 11:18:09 AM
1807 Views
OMGUS - Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 30/08/2009 03:03:21 PM
1014 Views
All right - new usernames (table)
- 30/08/2009 03:35:59 PM
1776 Views
Alrighty!!
- 30/08/2009 05:42:17 PM
1757 Views
You should have changed you name to....
- 30/08/2009 06:52:46 PM
1831 Views
Haha
- 30/08/2009 07:18:10 PM
1718 Views
Well, I confirm that, I'm an Aes Sedai
- 30/08/2009 08:37:32 PM
1671 Views
What I really think we should do....
- 30/08/2009 08:49:04 PM
1755 Views
Okay, that's a bad idea
- 30/08/2009 08:52:42 PM
1705 Views
So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:16:17 PM
1743 Views
Re: So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:24:22 PM
1787 Views
Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:27:29 PM
1743 Views
Re: Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:42:16 PM
1752 Views
See, now that we have others....
- 30/08/2009 10:09:00 PM
1638 Views
No way, me too.
- 30/08/2009 11:15:01 PM
1680 Views
Well, I might as well say it
- 31/08/2009 12:20:58 AM
1722 Views
Maybe we should just lynch Isaac.
- 30/08/2009 07:32:50 PM
1796 Views
Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:29:01 PM
1714 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:57:17 PM
1645 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 09:01:20 PM
1663 Views
I'm going to facepalm
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1659 Views
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1659 Views
LOL, you miss the point
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1752 Views
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1752 Views
How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 09:30:14 PM
1667 Views
Re: How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 10:02:33 PM
1809 Views
Do you mean that since you can't lie, saying you're for the Tower proves your goodness?
- 31/08/2009 01:44:01 AM
1579 Views
BTW
- 30/08/2009 08:43:16 PM
1744 Views
I would suggest you do it anyway so they're at least saved on this site. *NM*
- 30/08/2009 10:07:26 PM
1046 Views
I just sent myself the saved copy I had.
- 30/08/2009 10:17:46 PM
1737 Views
Howdy
- 31/08/2009 04:42:47 PM
1638 Views
I still can't see the fuss over Isaac's post
- 31/08/2009 05:25:14 PM
1702 Views
It was a misunderstanding, I think
- 31/08/2009 06:07:54 PM
1679 Views
^Read this^ Rather than the long discussion by Isaac and F-T
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
904 Views
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
904 Views
See, that looks pretty bad for you.
- 31/08/2009 07:37:28 PM
1651 Views
I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:49:45 PM
1626 Views
Re: I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:50:00 PM
1745 Views
? Never double-posted that way before *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:15:21 PM
968 Views
Congratulations of discovering new and exciting ways for us to embarrass ourselves
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
910 Views
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
910 Views
Well,
- 31/08/2009 09:00:47 PM
1585 Views
He said it was suspicious saying "For the Tower" as opposed to "For the Light".
- 31/08/2009 09:13:25 PM
1663 Views
It does look suspicous at this point....
- 31/08/2009 09:54:56 PM
1657 Views
I see what you mean but hardly agree with it
- 01/09/2009 02:05:07 AM
1654 Views
It's the best we've got right now.
- 01/09/2009 02:44:20 AM
1573 Views
I've done so much today. Hours of engineering and chem...again. *NM*
- 01/09/2009 02:57:08 AM
996 Views
I'm here
- 31/08/2009 06:16:40 PM
1576 Views
What's with everyone switching their usernames to their real names? lol *NM*
- 31/08/2009 08:51:23 PM
969 Views
Might as well move along
- 01/09/2009 12:36:28 AM
1684 Views
Okay.
- 01/09/2009 02:50:21 PM
1668 Views
Well, WF has had two days to reply, but hasn't even tried to defend himself.
- 01/09/2009 03:24:11 PM
1722 Views
I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 03:45:31 PM
1633 Views
Re: I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 07:23:00 PM
1595 Views
Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:26:29 PM
1647 Views
Re: Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:36:31 PM
1579 Views
I don't want a repeat of Game 2.
- 01/09/2009 07:50:57 PM
1668 Views
This is a good point.
- 01/09/2009 08:06:24 PM
1705 Views
As soon as he starts getting accused...
- 01/09/2009 09:49:14 PM
1602 Views
What you did was suspicious
- 01/09/2009 09:50:56 PM
1600 Views
I wish wotmania were still alive....
- 01/09/2009 10:06:03 PM
1635 Views
Yeah, and we cut you slack because you were a newbie.
- 01/09/2009 10:10:34 PM
1635 Views
Oh, well...
- 01/09/2009 10:53:57 PM
1574 Views
Well...it doesn't change what your doing
- 01/09/2009 11:02:48 PM
1612 Views
to avoid loads of editing
- 01/09/2009 09:22:36 PM
1729 Views
All right, I think we need to throw in the towel
- 01/09/2009 09:33:04 PM
1712 Views
nuts
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1654 Views
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1654 Views
Re: nuts
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1752 Views
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1752 Views
*sigh*
- 01/09/2009 10:27:57 PM
1653 Views
I still don't think we need to quit.
- 01/09/2009 10:31:30 PM
1694 Views
Guess I'll vote for White Flame as well.
- 01/09/2009 11:46:00 PM
1753 Views
Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 07:21:56 AM
1575 Views
Re: Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 06:58:22 PM
1681 Views
I think you should probably claim.
- 02/09/2009 08:24:02 PM
1565 Views
I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 09:42:48 PM
1579 Views
Re: I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 11:08:44 PM
1559 Views
Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 03:24:43 AM
1645 Views
Who are your warders?
- 02/09/2009 11:10:28 PM
1635 Views
My claim
- 03/09/2009 05:04:26 PM
1700 Views
Ok....
- 03/09/2009 05:08:25 PM
1515 Views
It doesn't sound that outlandish to me.
- 03/09/2009 07:11:06 PM
1591 Views
Nor I, but we now have some definite leads to work with
- 04/09/2009 05:13:18 AM
1643 Views
I'm not a warder
- 04/09/2009 01:01:27 PM
1580 Views
the situation so far
- 04/09/2009 06:02:36 PM
1587 Views
Can you keep some kind of constant form for the vote counts?
- 04/09/2009 06:11:53 PM
1609 Views

*NM*