It's essentially the same as when you were 'confirming' people to be vanilla townies when they used the term 'villager' in Game 2. You may recall, I was not a villager - I was a Yellow Ajah Aes Sedai - and yet through reading the opening post and your discussion with... why was it, CarnCarn? I deduced that was the keyword you were using and used it myself deliberately to demonstrate how the techniques was unfounded.
In this case, it is quite easily deduced from the opening post, and we (or I, anyway) don't even know what the Shadow roles' message contains - if it says, say 'you are against the Tower', it's quite easy to say what you just did. Nor does knowing this actually confirm anything. My role certainly did not contain the words 'You are for the Tower' or anything like it, though it is easily understood to be that way from the text.
In this case, it is quite easily deduced from the opening post, and we (or I, anyway) don't even know what the Shadow roles' message contains - if it says, say 'you are against the Tower', it's quite easy to say what you just did. Nor does knowing this actually confirm anything. My role certainly did not contain the words 'You are for the Tower' or anything like it, though it is easily understood to be that way from the text.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Mafia Day one
- 30/08/2009 10:53:04 AM
3277 Views
Vote tally
- 30/08/2009 11:10:18 AM
1858 Views
Tee hee hee.
- 30/08/2009 11:18:09 AM
1880 Views
OMGUS - Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 30/08/2009 03:03:21 PM
1046 Views
All right - new usernames (table)
- 30/08/2009 03:35:59 PM
1855 Views
Alrighty!!
- 30/08/2009 05:42:17 PM
1845 Views
You should have changed you name to....
- 30/08/2009 06:52:46 PM
1901 Views
Haha
- 30/08/2009 07:18:10 PM
1788 Views
Well, I confirm that, I'm an Aes Sedai
- 30/08/2009 08:37:32 PM
1744 Views
What I really think we should do....
- 30/08/2009 08:49:04 PM
1839 Views
Okay, that's a bad idea
- 30/08/2009 08:52:42 PM
1784 Views
So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:16:17 PM
1824 Views
Re: So this means you owe me money, right?
- 30/08/2009 09:24:22 PM
1864 Views
Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:27:29 PM
1812 Views
Re: Technically
- 30/08/2009 09:42:16 PM
1841 Views
See, now that we have others....
- 30/08/2009 10:09:00 PM
1710 Views
No way, me too.
- 30/08/2009 11:15:01 PM
1751 Views
Well, I might as well say it
- 31/08/2009 12:20:58 AM
1800 Views
Maybe we should just lynch Isaac.
- 30/08/2009 07:32:50 PM
1859 Views
Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:29:01 PM
1792 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 08:57:17 PM
1715 Views
Re: Just to address that
- 30/08/2009 09:01:20 PM
1734 Views
I'm going to facepalm
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1762 Views
.
- 30/08/2009 09:22:57 PM
1762 Views
LOL, you miss the point
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1825 Views
- 30/08/2009 09:27:31 PM
1825 Views
How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 09:30:14 PM
1753 Views
Re: How does it do that?
- 30/08/2009 10:02:33 PM
1876 Views
Do you mean that since you can't lie, saying you're for the Tower proves your goodness?
- 31/08/2009 01:44:01 AM
1654 Views
BTW
- 30/08/2009 08:43:16 PM
1814 Views
I would suggest you do it anyway so they're at least saved on this site. *NM*
- 30/08/2009 10:07:26 PM
1087 Views
I just sent myself the saved copy I had.
- 30/08/2009 10:17:46 PM
1802 Views
Howdy
- 31/08/2009 04:42:47 PM
1712 Views
I still can't see the fuss over Isaac's post
- 31/08/2009 05:25:14 PM
1760 Views
It was a misunderstanding, I think
- 31/08/2009 06:07:54 PM
1744 Views
^Read this^ Rather than the long discussion by Isaac and F-T
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
947 Views
*NM*
- 31/08/2009 07:07:41 PM
947 Views
See, that looks pretty bad for you.
- 31/08/2009 07:37:28 PM
1715 Views
I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:49:45 PM
1700 Views
Re: I think I have to agree with that
- 31/08/2009 08:50:00 PM
1820 Views
? Never double-posted that way before *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:15:21 PM
1007 Views
Congratulations of discovering new and exciting ways for us to embarrass ourselves
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
952 Views
. *NM*
- 31/08/2009 09:42:49 PM
952 Views
Well,
- 31/08/2009 09:00:47 PM
1654 Views
He said it was suspicious saying "For the Tower" as opposed to "For the Light".
- 31/08/2009 09:13:25 PM
1741 Views
It does look suspicous at this point....
- 31/08/2009 09:54:56 PM
1724 Views
I see what you mean but hardly agree with it
- 01/09/2009 02:05:07 AM
1727 Views
It's the best we've got right now.
- 01/09/2009 02:44:20 AM
1648 Views
I've done so much today. Hours of engineering and chem...again. *NM*
- 01/09/2009 02:57:08 AM
1034 Views
I'm here
- 31/08/2009 06:16:40 PM
1649 Views
What's with everyone switching their usernames to their real names? lol *NM*
- 31/08/2009 08:51:23 PM
1007 Views
Might as well move along
- 01/09/2009 12:36:28 AM
1756 Views
Okay.
- 01/09/2009 02:50:21 PM
1738 Views
Well, WF has had two days to reply, but hasn't even tried to defend himself.
- 01/09/2009 03:24:11 PM
1786 Views
I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 03:45:31 PM
1705 Views
Re: I don't intend to let him get out of it either.
- 01/09/2009 07:23:00 PM
1671 Views
Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:26:29 PM
1719 Views
Re: Well, it's easy to mount a defense after you've been told your error....
- 01/09/2009 07:36:31 PM
1644 Views
I don't want a repeat of Game 2.
- 01/09/2009 07:50:57 PM
1749 Views
This is a good point.
- 01/09/2009 08:06:24 PM
1769 Views
As soon as he starts getting accused...
- 01/09/2009 09:49:14 PM
1676 Views
What you did was suspicious
- 01/09/2009 09:50:56 PM
1680 Views
I wish wotmania were still alive....
- 01/09/2009 10:06:03 PM
1706 Views
Yeah, and we cut you slack because you were a newbie.
- 01/09/2009 10:10:34 PM
1694 Views
Oh, well...
- 01/09/2009 10:53:57 PM
1649 Views
Well...it doesn't change what your doing
- 01/09/2009 11:02:48 PM
1702 Views
to avoid loads of editing
- 01/09/2009 09:22:36 PM
1808 Views
All right, I think we need to throw in the towel
- 01/09/2009 09:33:04 PM
1782 Views
nuts
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1721 Views
- 01/09/2009 09:48:11 PM
1721 Views
Re: nuts
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1828 Views
- 01/09/2009 10:24:36 PM
1828 Views
*sigh*
- 01/09/2009 10:27:57 PM
1738 Views
I still don't think we need to quit.
- 01/09/2009 10:31:30 PM
1764 Views
Guess I'll vote for White Flame as well.
- 01/09/2009 11:46:00 PM
1815 Views
Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 07:21:56 AM
1638 Views
Re: Great. Everybody's going to be looking at me tomorrow if WF turns out to be a DF
- 02/09/2009 06:58:22 PM
1755 Views
I think you should probably claim.
- 02/09/2009 08:24:02 PM
1627 Views
I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 09:42:48 PM
1644 Views
Re: I would add my 2 cents here but I'm telling myself to stay out of it.
- 02/09/2009 11:08:44 PM
1631 Views
Day 1 no-lynch is a lose-lose tactic for the Light.
- 03/09/2009 03:24:43 AM
1712 Views
Who are your warders?
- 02/09/2009 11:10:28 PM
1718 Views
My claim
- 03/09/2009 05:04:26 PM
1779 Views
Ok....
- 03/09/2009 05:08:25 PM
1578 Views
It doesn't sound that outlandish to me.
- 03/09/2009 07:11:06 PM
1651 Views
Nor I, but we now have some definite leads to work with
- 04/09/2009 05:13:18 AM
1722 Views
I'm not a warder
- 04/09/2009 01:01:27 PM
1653 Views
the situation so far
- 04/09/2009 06:02:36 PM
1656 Views
Can you keep some kind of constant form for the vote counts?
- 04/09/2009 06:11:53 PM
1685 Views

*NM*