Everyone else is in so we should start pondering whether we want to do a second iteration of this or move on to accusations and such, I'm certainly open to either if someone has an accusation to throw out, so far nobody has really stepped forward and I'm a little gun shy about a thin case since these days a netted townie might have a lower ratio of voters who are scum then the whole group or a netted scummer might, as happened last game, have 3 of the 4 scummers voting for him with only 4 of the 9 townies doing likewise, 75% vs 44% on a day 1 thin evidence scummer takedown, along with lots of Day 1's where the townies did most of the townie lynching, really screws up the usefulness of voter tables as a means of determining who the bad and good guys are, and its practically a death sentence to even use the words "N* Ly%^h" so I suspect we need to keep pressing for more info, either from everyone or from some reduced "More Less Not Suspicious" Group, which I shall now deem MLNSG since I haven't coined an acronym (or initialism, whatver) recently. Speaking of which we should be pondering whether we may have a Tank-f scenario in play since that hasn't been around of late and Kronin's prior games all had them, as well as EMT scenarios and variable VNTL, either in regards to RBIRL or DVs.