Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM*
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM
Also, FT you didn't mention alignment, I don't know if that's an oversight or deliberate, and am kinda assuming ? was town but I did want to check on that ambiguity.
Anyway, ? was killed, and that's a weird choice. I suspect the scum would have believed his semi claim that he didn't have a night action, and he was probably vanilla, but going into the night the assumption would have been that he was vanilla or a passive role I'd think, and generally most passive roles are horrible candidates for NK, since that would tend to be bulletproof, mason, miller, bomb, etc. Further, ? was a probable lynch candidate, so it seems a weird choice, lacking alignment I suppose it's always possible he was scum and attacked a PGO, though that option would generally result in a dual kill depending on mod, or something along those lines but I think we should assume for the moment that ? was the target of the scum and probably vanilla.
It's rather hard to fathom a motive for killing him, though that could be motive in itself, I know when I'm scum I do try to pick targets who are unlikely to be docced or watched for instance. Still, it could indicate the scum know something we don't, I mean besides their own identities and abilities, because I really can't think of a motive to whack ? besides that. They had presumably 6-7 people to choose from, you'd think they'd have better options than the guy who had an anti-town mark on him and had basically claimed to be either vanilla or something a NK would usually not want to target, I sure as heck wouldn't want to burn a NK on someone who could be a good scapegoat for framing and who might be bulletproof, bomb, or miller, when I'd have a handful of other people to gamble on to try to get the cop or doc. I suppose he might have been targeted effectively randomly, or as a false flag to indicate the scum weren't too smart this game, but we should put our heads together real quick to see if anyone can think of another motive, like maybe he had indicated distrust or trust for a player that the scum might want to be otherwise, or might want us to think as much, "He clearly suspected X, and now he's dead" sort of thing along with attached WIFOM.
So can anyone shed light on a motive for this one? Hints, clues, thoughts, anything, say it if you've got it.
Anyway, ? was killed, and that's a weird choice. I suspect the scum would have believed his semi claim that he didn't have a night action, and he was probably vanilla, but going into the night the assumption would have been that he was vanilla or a passive role I'd think, and generally most passive roles are horrible candidates for NK, since that would tend to be bulletproof, mason, miller, bomb, etc. Further, ? was a probable lynch candidate, so it seems a weird choice, lacking alignment I suppose it's always possible he was scum and attacked a PGO, though that option would generally result in a dual kill depending on mod, or something along those lines but I think we should assume for the moment that ? was the target of the scum and probably vanilla.
It's rather hard to fathom a motive for killing him, though that could be motive in itself, I know when I'm scum I do try to pick targets who are unlikely to be docced or watched for instance. Still, it could indicate the scum know something we don't, I mean besides their own identities and abilities, because I really can't think of a motive to whack ? besides that. They had presumably 6-7 people to choose from, you'd think they'd have better options than the guy who had an anti-town mark on him and had basically claimed to be either vanilla or something a NK would usually not want to target, I sure as heck wouldn't want to burn a NK on someone who could be a good scapegoat for framing and who might be bulletproof, bomb, or miller, when I'd have a handful of other people to gamble on to try to get the cop or doc. I suppose he might have been targeted effectively randomly, or as a false flag to indicate the scum weren't too smart this game, but we should put our heads together real quick to see if anyone can think of another motive, like maybe he had indicated distrust or trust for a player that the scum might want to be otherwise, or might want us to think as much, "He clearly suspected X, and now he's dead" sort of thing along with attached WIFOM.
So can anyone shed light on a motive for this one? Hints, clues, thoughts, anything, say it if you've got it.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended
- 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM
1391 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ?
- 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM
1245 Views
Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM*
- 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM
524 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it
- 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM
1086 Views
Re: I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it
- 07/11/2011 12:57:32 AM
948 Views
... and the two things
- 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM
1098 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM
882 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM
1014 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM
927 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought
- 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM
917 Views
no *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM
541 Views
FT already banned it *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM
518 Views
Vote: ?
- 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM
1134 Views
He could have just been being polite
- 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM
1325 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday
- 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM
1091 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own
- 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM
1012 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want...
- 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM
979 Views
No, I don't want you to claim
- 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM
902 Views
Wait what's the difference?
- 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM
927 Views
is this gonna turn into that game where i got lynched thrice in one game but for ? instead?
- 07/11/2011 10:24:15 PM
991 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM
498 Views
out of what? *NM*
- 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM
483 Views
you have to go into the messege like i said ignore the *NM* prompt *NM*
- 07/11/2011 08:54:22 PM
449 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin
- 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM
1070 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think...
- 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM
1001 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis
- 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM
1151 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well
- 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM
992 Views
decoding:
- 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM
1030 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step?
- 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM
986 Views
Hmm...You mention me a lot in that post...Was that me as ? or me as Kronin? I'm a tad confused.
- 09/11/2011 11:28:55 PM
1122 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table)
- 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM
1039 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande.
- 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM
976 Views
EBWOP: here's the code.
- 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM
832 Views
EBWOP again
- 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM
810 Views
Stand by for the moment
- 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM
1001 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting.
- 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM
1005 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too
- 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM
1063 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM*
- 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM
540 Views
We still need you role decode *NM*
- 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM
457 Views
i am a cop
- 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM
848 Views
Ah, I was wondering how come there was suddenly thirty new posts in this thread.
- 10/11/2011 03:02:10 AM
812 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane.
- 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM
1071 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC
- 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM
942 Views
Sure...
- 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM
1161 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way
- 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM
1144 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched
- 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM
1027 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM*
- 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM
455 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM*
- 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM
534 Views
I hadn't performed one yet.
- 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM
984 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop
- 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM
872 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna
- 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM
1147 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table)
- 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM
1191 Views
Vote: ?
- 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM
863 Views
I'm down with voting for ?, as long as everyone is clear on what our night actions should be
- 12/11/2011 04:49:53 AM
976 Views
Game ends.
- 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM
949 Views
Role list:
- 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM
989 Views
Jeeez.
- 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM
958 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM*
- 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM
472 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator
- 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM
830 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system
- 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM
1074 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs
- 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM
996 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players.
- 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM
962 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in
- 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM
937 Views
I don't have anything prepared, so if Hieshyn wants it, I'll be happy to go after him
- 15/11/2011 03:28:40 AM
991 Views
I'm not ready to go next
- 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM
1073 Views
Aight, I think it's me then.
- 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM
846 Views
ooooh
- 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM
866 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding
- 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM
1191 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea.
- 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM
1292 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then
- 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM
1103 Views
Although really, it's the same as if in IRL everyone just wrote down their role on a piece of paper
- 15/11/2011 03:28:00 AM
977 Views
Yeah, I don't think it warrants being banned (hence why I didn't), but I don't like it. *NM*
- 15/11/2011 03:37:59 AM
525 Views

doubly so...
*NM*
*NM*
*NM*