No. Just no. You can't just suggest a convoluted plan with a lot of "we can go this way", "we might go that way" and "we will pretend to do something useful while throwing a coin" and then Lynch if somebody doesn't feel like it. Or feels uncomfortable with having to build a Lynch case on a person they may get randomly assigned.

Your argument that "you didn't give people sufficient motivation" is a strange one: people who do not answer get voted on, which I showed for Yuna. It worked for me anyway. It didn't work for beet, but I'll get back to that later on.

FT: I agree with your suggestion of it being the backbone to your plan, but it puts us back at square one. The big difference: if I understand correctly, everybody will get a different person to prosecute. So, instead of me and ranagrande agreeing that beet is suspicious (for different reasons), one would get to do beet and the other might get a random assignment. This is not "basically my original plan". A better suggestion might be that you, if you don't follow somebody's reasoning, ask that person to explain further. Let that be the backbone of your plan.

The reason your line of questioning is not coming to fruition, is because we got sidetracked. Twice. First by beet, now by Isaac.

We heard from FT who suggested the whole line of inquiry:

(it was ?) from ranagrande:

from ?:

from me:


This leaves Isaac, Yunalesca and beet. Yuna never answered my question (as we now know, she was AWOL), so I instead voted for her and asked beet next. I'm sure that Yuna would've answered (will answer?) soon now that she's back. beet never tried to answer at all, but instead tried to get us sidetracked (granted, I asked him BECAUSE I felt that he was sidetracking - not the other way around) with a suggestion that I'm personally not in favor of, but if a majority is in favor, I will participate in.
Isaac was not asked, as he was RBIRL for a while, but sidetracked us before he got asked. Same as beet.


So: I might as well go back, now that Yuna is back too. Yuna: you go ahead and answer my question above and give the turn to either beet or Isaac. From what I see here: both Isaac and beet are acting really suspicious. So, instead of playing the little game that Isaac wants me to play, let's just go out, Unvote and go back to my earlier idea of Vote: beetnemesis. Isaac, in my opinion, you're next.