Active Users:221 Time:18/05/2024 08:35:18 AM
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM

View original post
View original post1) He was originally flagged as suspicious for minimal participation, considered an anti-town action. He came up lowest in 4 methods:


View original postI did- was busy at work, and since not much conversation had happened, I hadn't made a substantial post yet.

That's not rebuttal it is an excuse, you could have posted RBIRL, of course you might not know what the term means, it hasn't been in use quite as long as "bussing" and I'm not if you ever asked and were told what it means.


View original post
View original post2) Upon coming up topping all those methods he posted in to hypothesize about game make up, at which point I felt his suggestions strongly implied he possessed some game relevant information as the suggestions were otherwise random and counter-indicated by the minimal knowledge of the game we had. The principle theories raised focused on multiple scum factions, a rare thing in a game of this size and while grounds for a mod to want many players to help absorb the extra night kills it is very definitely not a reason for a Mod to want 12 players. All options focused on an abnormally powerful scum faction(s).


View original postWhat I find interesting is that, despite your criticisms, no one has been able to come up with a good reason that Bergioyn asked for specifically 12 players. And I stand by my point that if it was as simple as "doc, cop, and some townies" vs "scum and a roleblocker," that he would not need a specific number- 11 or 13 is just as workable.

No one knows why as we have no evidence as to why, all of us could speculate wildly about it, he may simply have wanted a classic 12 player game, there are a virtually unlimited number of scenarios which fit it, I could fill pages with them and none would have anything to back them up, hence why I haven't speculated and why I think most haven't, beyond what many of us have said which is that we don't know what is going on. You either know something and are now lying about it or were speculating totally at random to know conceivable gain for the town. You could have simply stopped at saying "12 seemed important, we might want to consider why?", now apparently some others hadn't already noticed that, I assumed most of us caught that before the game began, so I may have been overly harsh by assuming everything you said was totally pointless but your reactions after that have increasingly led me to believe you're lying.


View original postMy post was based on guesswork and extrapolation- which, for Day One, is pretty much all there is to go on.


View original post
View original post3) He accused me, on the grounds I clearly thought he knew something, though he claims to know nothing. This accusation to be logically coherent would require A) That he had guessed and guessed correctly and B) That I was a scummer and C) that I would believe he had not guessed and D) That with all of these I would tip my hand so out of character and incredibly clumsily of fashions. All 4 of these improbable conditions must be true for his accusation to be viable, and thus far he has not even confirmed the first one, he has not yet denied having extra knowledge and has IMO sought to imply he did even as he presents an accusation that can only be true if he does not.


View original postI accused you because you were being uncharacteristically aggressive. We don't need the universe to form a once in a lifetime conflux for you to be scum. It's just as simple to say:

Uncharacteristically aggressive? The overwhelming majority of Day 1 lynches has been initiated and prosecuted by either myself or FT, I suspect if you added them up we'd each have more than every other player, present or past, combined. How could I even be uncharacteristically aggressive, I have in the past actually threatened to kill players if they did not vote with me, and done it too. I'm pretty sure in order to be uncharacteristically aggressive I'd have to do as Danny suggested earlier and actually show up at a players house with baseball bat in hand.


View original posta)That you saw me post something that you thought you could seize on

Problem here, I seized on it, but not to accuse you, I considered you're remarks to be strongly indicative of more info and asked for it, if my tone was abrupt it was related to us spinning our wheels trying to find information only to find out a player who hadn't been posting seemed to have what we needed. That's not accusation, that's inquiry.


View original postb)That for whatever reason (either that I hit close to home, or that I was simply a target of opportunity) you figured the best defense was a strong offense

Best Defense? No one was even accusing me except Danny and he's been accused by others for his accusation. What could I possibly have needed to defend myself from?


View original postI haven't implied I have any extra knowledge beyond the ability to do simple arithmetic.

Well that's a lie, you've outright said you've got the special ability to read my motives and alignment, but in terms of game knowledge, I disagree. I think you intentionally were trying to call game options into play. The alternative, that you claim is true, is hardly more flattering, after being threatened with death for non-participation to avoid it you spewed out several random unsupported theories that served zero purpose but to distract us.


View original post
View original post4) He was asked by multiple players to role claim, a customary request when one is considered a primary lynch candidate, which is obviously the case. He was also reminded that any delay would damage the credibility of his claim, he has neither roleclaimed nor offered any defense or reason why he should not.


View original postI believe "roleclaim" has come up... twice? Ranagrande just (as in, TODAY) asked for one, and I believe someone mentioned it at the beginning of your attack. I'll respond to ranagrande shortly, and I ignored the original one because it was early in the day, and there was no particular push for a roleclaim (and I had other posts to respond to)

Twice? It was 7 when you wrote this and 6 when rana said 'several', 4 directly asking and two by voting with us. Ranagrande said "Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet", and he was right. Every vote on you, (4 - me, FT, Yuna, Fox ), backs a request for a roleclaim, then there's Rana, 5, and Hobo, 6, and Artsapat, 7.

That leaves Praz, ST (silent), Danny (RBIRL) and Taiga. 7 of 11 have either voted for your, demanded an RC, or both. We may safely assume the people voting for you want an RC too. That leaves 4 players, and we can drop the 2 who are both quiet and new, leaving PRaz and Taiga, neither of whom have defended you, 7-0 demanding an RC.


View original post
View original post5) In his remarks he referenced being 'bussed', a term regularly used here and exclusively to refer to when a scummer votes for another scummer. Revealing slips of this nature are not unheard of even very rare, but may be sheer accident so he was asked to explain it. Rather than claiming it was an innocent slip of words he instead claimed the term did not mean that, and replied evasively when told by the two most senior players that it only means that, including citations of the mafiascum wiki and a post where he himself asked what the term meant and was told, in absolutely unambiguous language, what the term meant, by the moderator of the game herself. He was also challenged to find any use by any player if the term in which his definition was used or even a definition other than the one given. He has not done so, instead claiming that even taking note of the usage is 'grasping at straws', this is not a proper offense but is instead an attempt to discredit the accusation rather than justify his own actions.


View original postThis entire point is laughable. What it boils down to is that I mixed up the meanings of "bussed" and "bandwagoned." I apologize that the instruction I received 4 years ago (from a mod nonwithstanding) was not seared into my brain.

I'm pretty sure I learned what the term "Internet" meant more than 4 years ago, but its constant reinforcement makes that timeline irrelevant. The word "Bussing" has been used 98 times and "bussed" 53 times since we came to RAFO, you presumably after being told what it meant might have forgotten. But bringing up the 4 year ago incident proves you inquired and were told by an unimpeachable source you'd have read, that's hwy that matters, you keep trying to wave it away but it establishes you knew, now you're claiming to have forgotten but to do that you'd have had to misundertand it being referenced 150 times since then, not even including simple uses of "Bus" which appears 100 more times. We've had about 20 games since then averaging around 4 days a game, meaning the term gets used about 3 times per game Day. You are claiming that in spite having it clearly and explicitly explained to you by the mod after you asked what it meant you not only forgot (improbable) but did so even with it coming up on average multiple times per game day.

Well, there is something laughable about the situation but I don't think it relates to my arguments.


View original post
View original post6) His entire defense now rests on a counter-accusation at myself,


View original postActually, my entire defense rests on the fact that I've done nothing wrong. My OFFENSE rests on the fact that anyone who's played with you should be able to realize that you have an agenda.

Of course I have an agenda, I should imagine everyone here does but me? Seriously? Hell, next you can defend yourself by claiming that water is wet.


View original postThis isn't an either-or, and the fact that you're trying to make it one further speaks to your duplicity.

This isn't either-or? You're the one who reacted to my - admittedly strongly worded - request for you to reveal any knowledge you had with accusations. You could have simply said, "Sorry if I implied special knowledge, I was thinking out loud. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew I was paying attention" and I would have glared at you with some suspicion, then shrugged and moved to other avenues.


View original postIsaac became aggressive towards me immediately after my big post. His entire case against me boils down to:


View original post- beetnemesis made a rambling post with some odd theories


View original postHis other points are just bits and pieces he's picked up to try to make it seem like he has a legitimate accusation.

4 votes plus 3 other players demanding an RC doesn't strike me as 'bits and pieces'

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Mafia 32 - No Fancy Title - Day 1 - 28/07/2013 06:46:40 PM 2721 Views
Present *NM* - 28/07/2013 07:52:29 PM 702 Views
Reporting in *NM* - 28/07/2013 09:50:47 PM 676 Views
Here. *NM* - 28/07/2013 10:42:26 PM 699 Views
Present! *NM* - 28/07/2013 11:03:03 PM 741 Views
I stand ready. *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:36:27 AM 702 Views
Helloooooo Players! *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:54:16 AM 693 Views
So, where to begin? *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:43:48 AM 699 Views
Use lube, this is my first time! *NM* - 29/07/2013 08:26:59 AM 672 Views
I loled *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:31:08 AM 714 Views
Just because of this comment I know he'll fit right in. - 01/08/2013 10:38:01 AM 989 Views
Fox is being triggerhappy. *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:08:21 PM 692 Views
It's always fun on day 1! *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:37:26 PM 689 Views
RBIRL from Tuesday to Sunday - 29/07/2013 01:06:35 PM 1026 Views
I'm RBIRL from friday to sunday, myself - 29/07/2013 02:10:19 PM 1131 Views
RBIRL from Wednesday to Saturday. - 29/07/2013 02:18:47 PM 1037 Views
I'm joining the RBIRL train - 31/07/2013 01:50:55 PM 1032 Views
Present *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:53:40 PM 724 Views
apparently we got no fancy fantasy theme, but straight Mafia *NM* - 29/07/2013 03:18:18 PM 687 Views
I'm actually kinda glad. I think it was getting too...complicated for me. - 29/07/2013 03:48:33 PM 1077 Views
Agreed, but I would imagine Bergioyn might have some twists in store for us. - 29/07/2013 09:52:30 PM 1002 Views
Eh, Let's just go. IT WAS YOU THAT DID IT, WASN'T IT *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:56:49 PM 656 Views
It was you that done it, now own up! *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:41:40 PM 695 Views
Okay! I admit it! It was me! Oh wait... were you talking to or him? *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:31:30 AM 546 Views
Vote: Hobo - 30/07/2013 02:43:15 AM 1047 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 12:27:15 AM 1044 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 10:44:27 AM 1104 Views
I don't think it was - 01/08/2013 12:50:24 PM 1036 Views
If I remember correctly he had some dastatdly plot to catch the scum. - 01/08/2013 04:32:51 PM 1025 Views
He was very unclear on tha tpoint after the fact - 01/08/2013 11:27:00 PM 1108 Views
No, his plan was actually pretty good. - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 AM 1125 Views
How is that a good plan? - 06/08/2013 06:37:24 AM 1176 Views
Well, believe it or not, I swear it wasn't me this time. I blame s *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:07:38 PM 703 Views
it was probably Isaac but in the end he'll win the game *NM* - 30/07/2013 05:37:07 PM 667 Views
Rule #1: Isaac wins *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:18:38 PM 742 Views
Rules are made to be broken. *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:51:38 PM 702 Views
But is this rule able to be broken? *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:54:22 PM 690 Views
Sure. Last time he lost was game 29. *NM* - 30/07/2013 09:32:45 PM 664 Views
Surely you recall the Marvel[ous] Siege? You were mason buddy - 01/08/2013 12:14:47 AM 1025 Views
I vaguely remember the Marvel game, but not any specifics... *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:55:24 PM 669 Views
I do... - 05/08/2013 04:25:10 AM 1008 Views
Rule #2: Isaac is always suspected, but not lynched. *NM* - 30/07/2013 10:32:57 PM 690 Views
Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 10:45:39 AM 918 Views
Re: Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 12:18:52 PM 1121 Views
(here) *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:03:26 PM 654 Views
Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 30/07/2013 12:56:04 PM 1104 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 31/07/2013 09:19:11 AM 1136 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 10:50:16 AM 987 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 12:11:33 AM 1013 Views
Activate! *NM* - 31/07/2013 03:03:50 AM 683 Views
Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 10:35:51 AM 983 Views
Re: Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 11:06:23 AM 1013 Views
Okay, getting moving (Table) - 01/08/2013 11:45:30 PM 1111 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 02/08/2013 02:32:52 AM 661 Views
Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 08:54:12 AM 1039 Views
Re: Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 09:50:24 AM 983 Views
Yeah, my name's a real one too, just not logically related to anything in the game. *NM* - 02/08/2013 07:17:42 PM 658 Views
Same here. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:54:10 PM 635 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 02/08/2013 01:03:24 PM 638 Views
Yes, no, no *NM* - 02/08/2013 08:26:52 PM 579 Views
yes, no, no *NM* - 03/08/2013 01:10:00 AM 666 Views
would be nice if one player answered Yes, Yes. Yes now: Lie = lynch *NM* - 03/08/2013 09:12:07 AM 645 Views
Well I'm reasonably sure some of them will either answer other then yes, no, no or lie - 03/08/2013 12:29:34 PM 1034 Views
Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 09:02:49 AM 930 Views
Re: Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 11:19:03 AM 1003 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 03/08/2013 11:06:41 PM 662 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:11 PM 546 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:47 PM 630 Views
Dangit, I hate when I double post. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:53:29 PM 691 Views
Yes, No No *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:28:03 AM 642 Views
Sorry I didn't have anything new to add... *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:29:28 AM 636 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 06/08/2013 12:46:10 AM 610 Views
I might as well Unvote before I forget - 02/08/2013 03:32:43 PM 969 Views
EBWOP - 02/08/2013 03:33:23 PM 950 Views
Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 05:09:47 AM 1080 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 07:32:48 AM 981 Views
The "... and people die" part is probably accurate though *NM* - 03/08/2013 12:32:40 PM 649 Views
Correlation does not equal causation . *NM* - 03/08/2013 05:42:30 PM 659 Views
Precisely *NM* - 04/08/2013 11:22:52 AM 640 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 05/08/2013 08:31:03 PM 1065 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 06/08/2013 06:40:24 AM 1023 Views
Baaaack~ - 03/08/2013 11:26:57 PM 1023 Views
Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 07:03:07 PM 1066 Views
Well - 05/08/2013 07:25:22 PM 961 Views
That is correct - 05/08/2013 07:35:24 PM 969 Views
Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 09:42:23 PM 1030 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:09:48 PM 1026 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:20:02 PM 1073 Views
I posted I was back.... NLRBIRL *NM* - 05/08/2013 10:25:58 PM 615 Views
Yeah, I missed that. Sorry *NM* - 06/08/2013 03:13:11 AM 644 Views
What's the NL for? RBIRL Real Busy in Real Life, NL=? - 06/08/2013 08:56:16 AM 1005 Views
Oh, duh, "No Longer" RBIRL *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:57:15 AM 623 Views
Yup *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 PM 679 Views
would be a very awkward abbreviation - 07/08/2013 10:05:17 AM 997 Views
Re: Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 08:26:01 PM 1120 Views
Agreed. Random lynches seem like a last resort to me. - 05/08/2013 08:55:59 PM 1038 Views
Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:52:25 AM 1056 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 06:59:26 AM 1024 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 10:01:18 AM 1067 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:56:47 PM 1131 Views
I didn't have anything either. *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:02:46 PM 665 Views
No, I'm sorry, I don't - 06/08/2013 02:33:58 PM 1095 Views
No appearance was described in my role message. *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:45:51 PM 663 Views
Nope. *NM* - 07/08/2013 07:23:00 PM 667 Views
No, nothing on appearance *NM* - 07/08/2013 09:02:11 PM 678 Views
I think we may need to contemplate some semi-random options - 06/08/2013 07:55:25 AM 1003 Views
List of remarks by the 'accused', plus some remarks on them - 06/08/2013 08:51:15 AM 1218 Views
explanation - 06/08/2013 09:05:55 AM 1095 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:47:35 AM 1072 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:59:45 AM 1112 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 01:28:49 PM 1039 Views
I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 06/08/2013 10:00:22 AM 1063 Views
Re: I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 07/08/2013 07:48:34 PM 1009 Views
Your questions - 06/08/2013 02:59:16 PM 1076 Views
I apparently answered your questions backwards - 06/08/2013 03:06:06 PM 983 Views
I would look at it a bit differently, even if the outcome doesn't change that much - 06/08/2013 03:55:12 PM 1083 Views
Well, I'm impressed - 06/08/2013 04:11:31 PM 991 Views
I thank you for the compliment. - 06/08/2013 09:51:54 PM 1063 Views
Re: I thank you for the compliment. - 07/08/2013 01:53:25 AM 1030 Views
Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 11:08:21 AM 1046 Views
Re: Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 01:01:55 PM 1056 Views
Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 09:46:26 PM 1093 Views
I think you just killed Beetnemesis *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:56:16 PM 635 Views
Better him than me . *NM* - 07/08/2013 11:16:29 PM 648 Views
Re: Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 11:32:12 PM 1017 Views
nice analysis - 07/08/2013 10:25:20 AM 968 Views
Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 07:20:07 PM 1023 Views
Re: Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 08:22:47 PM 967 Views
Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 03:37:36 PM 988 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:11:04 PM 1041 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:43:12 PM 1038 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 05:34:04 PM 1047 Views
He really is... - 07/08/2013 04:55:59 PM 1029 Views
Re: He really is... - 07/08/2013 08:36:44 PM 1083 Views
Hm, that's not quite what I was thinking when I said that - 08/08/2013 08:49:11 PM 964 Views
BAMF? - 07/08/2013 06:31:59 PM 1030 Views
It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:38:24 PM 1029 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:42:30 PM 1099 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:45:49 PM 1064 Views
When it comes to Marvel, it's Spidey and Deadpool all the way! X-Men. Pffft. - 07/08/2013 10:38:41 PM 984 Views
Dr Doom was always my favorite hero in Marvel, but Deadpool is pretty cool *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:52:39 PM 632 Views
Dr Doom has cool costume, but other than that I don't know much about him. - 07/08/2013 11:37:09 PM 1006 Views
He's Marvel's Lex Luthor, only much cooler - 07/08/2013 11:48:00 PM 950 Views
I'd actually say he's a bit more like Marvel's Superman than Marvel's Lex Luthor. - 07/08/2013 11:54:14 PM 1083 Views
I'm not a Marvel fan, but Doom is amazing. - 07/08/2013 11:52:09 PM 988 Views
OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 04:49:33 PM 1036 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 05:44:09 PM 1091 Views
Well, you obviously know something, so out with it - 07/08/2013 06:33:04 PM 1006 Views
With that in mind... sounds like I hit too close to home, and you got sensitive - 08/08/2013 03:10:50 AM 1073 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis, Are you accusing me of being scum for pointing out your post had no substance? - 08/08/2013 03:39:25 AM 1120 Views
Re: - 08/08/2013 06:30:26 AM 995 Views
Granted, as you yourself pointed out: attack is the best defense - 08/08/2013 08:17:31 AM 966 Views
How often do we even have SKs? *NM* - 08/08/2013 09:39:58 AM 730 Views
This pushes it over the edge for me too. - 08/08/2013 01:13:21 PM 1005 Views
Hah. You got prickly pretty quickly. - 08/08/2013 07:39:24 PM 1026 Views
Prickly? I'm not touchy about it just suspiscious - 08/08/2013 08:01:39 PM 994 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 06:38:45 PM 1011 Views
My feeling is that a "normal" game is pretty easy to balance - 08/08/2013 03:08:09 AM 991 Views
re - 07/08/2013 08:36:15 PM 1027 Views
Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 04:31:26 PM 1033 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 05:44:54 PM 1049 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 07:51:09 PM 1052 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:02:45 PM 1015 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:05:52 PM 1144 Views
The thing we want to avoid is MASS roleclaim - 09/08/2013 08:30:32 AM 938 Views
Okay, almost totally off topic but... - 07/08/2013 11:40:54 PM 943 Views
The problem with that - 08/08/2013 08:09:56 AM 1028 Views
Re: The problem with that - 08/08/2013 05:02:56 PM 992 Views
Reminds me of the Cairhien game a bit. - 08/08/2013 06:14:17 PM 967 Views
That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 07:48:42 PM 980 Views
I haaaated the Cairhien game - 08/08/2013 08:16:57 PM 1050 Views
Re: That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 09:42:25 PM 978 Views
Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 05:51:23 PM 979 Views
My take: - 08/08/2013 08:00:13 PM 1165 Views
Did you just admit to being a scummer? - 08/08/2013 08:04:21 PM 1057 Views
Hah, remember when I mentioned grasping at straws? - 08/08/2013 09:31:35 PM 992 Views
We have always used the term that way, always, that and only that back to game 2 - 08/08/2013 09:44:20 PM 1044 Views
Holy crap, 4 years ago. - 09/08/2013 02:09:09 AM 909 Views
That's when you asked and were told by the Moderator, it has come up since then many times - 09/08/2013 04:10:28 AM 994 Views
I can't be the only person laughing at you right now - 09/08/2013 05:44:03 PM 998 Views
I doubt anyone is laughing including yourself - 09/08/2013 06:08:41 PM 917 Views
No, he's correct. - 08/08/2013 09:53:43 PM 1088 Views
Re: My take: - 08/08/2013 08:12:46 PM 1074 Views
To be a student of Isaac is a subtle thing - 08/08/2013 09:30:02 PM 957 Views
sure - 08/08/2013 08:44:06 PM 979 Views
Hmm, my thoughts, - 08/08/2013 08:56:27 PM 1070 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 10:30:22 PM 1008 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 11:18:56 PM 1086 Views
"Post count" usually acts as a tiebreaker - 09/08/2013 02:12:28 AM 1032 Views
I disagree - 09/08/2013 09:00:33 AM 981 Views
Re: I disagree - 09/08/2013 11:25:29 AM 966 Views
Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet - 09/08/2013 09:06:28 AM 999 Views
I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 09:16:51 AM 989 Views
Re: I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 03:18:38 PM 1033 Views
No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 03:49:21 PM 963 Views
Re: No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 04:05:31 PM 988 Views
Ah. Well that definitely explains it. *NM* - 09/08/2013 04:49:55 PM 638 Views
That's awesome. *NM* - 09/08/2013 09:21:59 PM 633 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 09/08/2013 11:48:13 AM 959 Views
I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 05:47:23 PM 997 Views
Re: I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 07:10:44 PM 881 Views
OK, so the smiley was a typo - 09/08/2013 07:26:58 PM 1018 Views
I do, but - 09/08/2013 03:39:28 PM 984 Views
RBIRL - 09/08/2013 05:50:21 AM 1007 Views
The case on Beetnemesis - 09/08/2013 05:05:32 PM 1108 Views
Ah good, time for a point-by-point rebuttal - 09/08/2013 06:04:11 PM 1021 Views
EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 06:14:25 PM 1062 Views
Actually... - 09/08/2013 06:38:26 PM 1028 Views
I can't see any difference with Isaac's "aggressiveness". *NM* - 09/08/2013 07:31:28 PM 709 Views
Re: EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 07:55:19 PM 1119 Views
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM 1065 Views
Shrug, I have nothing against roleclaiming. Roleclaim: Tracker - 09/08/2013 07:33:40 PM 1010 Views
Correct me if wrong... - 09/08/2013 08:39:58 PM 1047 Views
Exactly! - 09/08/2013 11:06:25 PM 1061 Views
Wow, I'm gone for 24 hours, - 11/08/2013 12:02:38 AM 1016 Views
No, you just did everything you could to avoid it, like claiming almost no one had asked... - 09/08/2013 08:42:10 PM 1089 Views
I think you're right. - 09/08/2013 11:47:32 PM 1231 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:49:12 PM 1007 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 08:04:42 PM 1042 Views
too much mud - 09/08/2013 09:50:35 PM 1106 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 11/08/2013 10:32:51 AM 1177 Views
@ Mod, Vote Check - 11/08/2013 04:46:16 PM 1017 Views
That's a valid vote, I had missed it. Twilight pending. - 11/08/2013 05:36:13 PM 982 Views
Actually, so did I. Did I hammer? - 11/08/2013 05:55:14 PM 977 Views
Yes. *NM* - 11/08/2013 05:59:47 PM 505 Views
beetnemesis has been lynched. - 11/08/2013 05:52:43 PM 1074 Views

Reply to Message