Well, nothing glares out, except I doubt Fox and Beetnemesis were tandem voting with a one minute difference, but either or both maybe of FT.

Note: What I mean by 'tandem voting' does not necessarily mean 'conspiring together', it means you voted because someone else did, i.e. "FT's argument makes sense" or "Well, I might as well vote with them too" or "Hey, my DF's buddies are voting for X, better join 'em" etc. I'm using it in the sense of 'one follows the other' or 'a team working together', either is appropriate, hence 'tandem'. I believe I've tossed this term around before, so I figured I should explain it real quick.

So, look at the vote times, and the reasons given, it's rather obvious why both Hopper and I voted early. He was suicidal and I already listed a bunch of reasons, but the initial vote was actually cast just to see where he was going with it, the other reasons were why I did not unvote later.

It appears DK voted for a similiar reason "Where are you going with this?". Now, at this point, we have three votes on hopper, himself, me, and Katie. Nothing much happens for a while, some hours later Murtach votes for NApoleon, who he later hypocops as guilty. THis is very bizarre, and makes me suspicious, so FOS: MUrtach74 and all.

A day passes since Hopper initiates the lemming maneuver, and FT votes for him, citing agreement with my argument that boiled down to 'Kill him so people don't try this sort of tactic in the future' as his reason. DK agreed with that as well, so we have a three-person voting bloc. Me, DK, and FT - at this point a vote avalanche begins, off FT basically. Now FT is known to be an experienced and cunning player, so I could easily see if he were a DF, his allies following his lead, the same could apply to DK but I think a tandem vote from her would have happened earlier than it did.

SO I'd actually like to see FT copped tonight, he's a potent ally if crew and probably the de facto ringleader if imperial, it would be nice to be sure of him, so multiple people should hypocop him tomorrow I think, I don't want to lynch him today.

The next three votes, Fox, beetnemesis, and Bergioyn all vote within a short time of FT. Fox gives a fairly solid reason, the other two do not, so FOS: beetnemesis and Bergoiyn.

Now Fistofpainx votes, no real commentary on why either, so FOS him too. Albeit, DF's are also inclined to explain there actions because they assume someone will want one, 'I think he doth protest too much' - By the way, newer players, FOS = Finger of Suspicion, sort of a near vote.

Napoleon and Gher finish things off, very normal for Napoleon, who basically backs all votes on general principle, and Gher, who seems to keep voting five minutes after the hammer vote has occured.

Any of the people I didn't FOS could easily be DFs, and the others who I did FOS might be lightsiders, byut I'm betting the majority of those I FOS'd are DFs, and I think this is the list we should agree to lynch from today, again:

Murtach74
Beetnemesis
Bergioyn
Fistofpainx

That's four people, out of 15, we should be able to further narrow this down and pick someone. Personally I'll cross of Murtach74, just because even if he is a DF, I don't see his death telling us much of anything, so why bother lynching him now?

Would anyone now like to make a case to add someone to this list, or to subtract someone from the list, or mount an accusation or defense of someone on that list?