Enjoyed it, despite a few flaws, as much as the first *spoilers*
ironclad Send a noteboard - 07/05/2010 08:30:04 AM
And here's why:
It was a sequel that felt like the logical continuation of the first, the feeling was the same and that's always a great thing. It was fun to follow those characters around some more, especially Downey Jr. was, once again, so full of sarcasm, arrogance, but also sudden traces of vulnerability that makes it so easy to cheer for this hero, despite of his "better than you"-attitude. To have him, Jackson and Johansson around one table, and playing these characters, gave me a bit of a geekasm. Rockwell and Rourke were excellent bad guys and worked great together, as different as they were.
Now, after the pretty great action sequence at the Monaco race tracks, the film gets a little too chatty and the middle part has no real action to offer except for IM and Rhodey beating the shit out of each other to the tunes of Daft Punk. There also were a few scenes that could have needed a little more explanation. Like how Rhodey could just come and fly the suit so easily after we witnessed Stark's rather catastrophic first steps in the first film.
What saves the film through that somewhat bumpy part is the humor, which does not only come from Stark but almost the entire cast. Had a few really big laughs there.
The movie finally gets en par with the first by delivering a far more spectacular and fun showdown. The Black Widow scenes are as cool as Kick-Ass' Hit Girl recently.
The after-credits hint at the Avengers showing Thor's Hammer in a New Mexican crater (and Cap's shield showing up earlier already) makes me really look forward to the next films and particularly the gathering down the line.
So, very enjoyable, if you ignore a few flaws. Great blockbuster entertainment.
8 out of 10 donuts
It was a sequel that felt like the logical continuation of the first, the feeling was the same and that's always a great thing. It was fun to follow those characters around some more, especially Downey Jr. was, once again, so full of sarcasm, arrogance, but also sudden traces of vulnerability that makes it so easy to cheer for this hero, despite of his "better than you"-attitude. To have him, Jackson and Johansson around one table, and playing these characters, gave me a bit of a geekasm. Rockwell and Rourke were excellent bad guys and worked great together, as different as they were.
Now, after the pretty great action sequence at the Monaco race tracks, the film gets a little too chatty and the middle part has no real action to offer except for IM and Rhodey beating the shit out of each other to the tunes of Daft Punk. There also were a few scenes that could have needed a little more explanation. Like how Rhodey could just come and fly the suit so easily after we witnessed Stark's rather catastrophic first steps in the first film.
What saves the film through that somewhat bumpy part is the humor, which does not only come from Stark but almost the entire cast. Had a few really big laughs there.
The movie finally gets en par with the first by delivering a far more spectacular and fun showdown. The Black Widow scenes are as cool as Kick-Ass' Hit Girl recently.
The after-credits hint at the Avengers showing Thor's Hammer in a New Mexican crater (and Cap's shield showing up earlier already) makes me really look forward to the next films and particularly the gathering down the line.
So, very enjoyable, if you ignore a few flaws. Great blockbuster entertainment.
8 out of 10 donuts
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Iron Man 2 discussion thread
05/05/2010 03:29:07 PM
- 788 Views
Enjoyed it, despite a few flaws, as much as the first *spoilers*
07/05/2010 08:30:04 AM
- 437 Views
Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian.
07/05/2010 06:28:12 PM
- 465 Views
I don't imagine I need to tell you they do the same with most other cultures. *NM*
08/05/2010 01:03:22 AM
- 182 Views
I know. On the other hand, as movies become more global they should improve on that.
08/05/2010 04:32:09 AM
- 394 Views
Why don't they just do like Team America and Durka Durka their way through the language. *NM*
09/05/2010 05:56:14 PM
- 179 Views
Hollywood? Her character was named and introduced in Tales of Suspense in 1964.
08/05/2010 02:18:49 AM
- 413 Views
Yeah, because Hollywood invented Vanko, Natasha, and Chekhov.
*NM*
08/05/2010 04:39:37 AM
- 230 Views

Re: Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian.
08/05/2010 11:55:57 AM
- 612 Views
You bring up good points about Hollywood's idiocy generally. I don't disagree.
08/05/2010 02:12:10 PM
- 429 Views
Re: You bring up good points about Hollywood's idiocy generally. I don't disagree.
31/05/2010 07:08:36 AM
- 383 Views
insert Arab or Muslim where you have Russian and then you know how i feel. *NM*
11/05/2010 05:33:04 AM
- 179 Views
Or insert German and replace everything else in the rant with "they are Nazis!!!!111!!!1"
*NM*
05/06/2010 02:24:26 AM
- 166 Views

Re: Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian.
21/05/2010 06:41:04 PM
- 391 Views
Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains.
08/05/2010 05:21:45 AM
- 440 Views
This was the same villain pattern as Batman 2
08/05/2010 11:20:53 AM
- 431 Views
Batman Returns or The Dark Knight?
08/05/2010 09:20:24 PM
- 395 Views
Re: Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains.
09/05/2010 04:41:49 PM
- 423 Views
I didn't really mind Vanko wanting Stark dead, although it was pretty silly.
09/05/2010 05:29:32 PM
- 383 Views