Active Users:323 Time:06/07/2025 10:50:27 AM
Enjoyed it, despite a few flaws, as much as the first *spoilers* ironclad Send a noteboard - 07/05/2010 08:30:04 AM
And here's why:

It was a sequel that felt like the logical continuation of the first, the feeling was the same and that's always a great thing. It was fun to follow those characters around some more, especially Downey Jr. was, once again, so full of sarcasm, arrogance, but also sudden traces of vulnerability that makes it so easy to cheer for this hero, despite of his "better than you"-attitude. To have him, Jackson and Johansson around one table, and playing these characters, gave me a bit of a geekasm. Rockwell and Rourke were excellent bad guys and worked great together, as different as they were.

Now, after the pretty great action sequence at the Monaco race tracks, the film gets a little too chatty and the middle part has no real action to offer except for IM and Rhodey beating the shit out of each other to the tunes of Daft Punk. There also were a few scenes that could have needed a little more explanation. Like how Rhodey could just come and fly the suit so easily after we witnessed Stark's rather catastrophic first steps in the first film.

What saves the film through that somewhat bumpy part is the humor, which does not only come from Stark but almost the entire cast. Had a few really big laughs there.

The movie finally gets en par with the first by delivering a far more spectacular and fun showdown. The Black Widow scenes are as cool as Kick-Ass' Hit Girl recently.
The after-credits hint at the Avengers showing Thor's Hammer in a New Mexican crater (and Cap's shield showing up earlier already) makes me really look forward to the next films and particularly the gathering down the line.

So, very enjoyable, if you ignore a few flaws. Great blockbuster entertainment.

8 out of 10 donuts
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Iron Man 2 discussion thread - 05/05/2010 03:29:07 PM 788 Views
saw it yesterday at a friends house - 05/05/2010 04:28:33 PM 401 Views
Not amazing, but enjoyable. (no spoilers) - 06/05/2010 12:46:51 AM 437 Views
Enjoyed it, despite a few flaws, as much as the first *spoilers* - 07/05/2010 08:30:04 AM 437 Views
Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian. - 07/05/2010 06:28:12 PM 465 Views
Who cares? It's Russian. *NM* - 07/05/2010 06:45:42 PM 191 Views
Hollywood? Her character was named and introduced in Tales of Suspense in 1964. - 08/05/2010 02:18:49 AM 413 Views
Yes, I forgot about those pathetic fanboys. *NM* - 08/05/2010 04:33:10 AM 187 Views
Yeah, because Hollywood invented Vanko, Natasha, and Chekhov. *NM* - 08/05/2010 04:39:37 AM 230 Views
Re: Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian. - 21/05/2010 06:41:04 PM 391 Views
Her real name was Natasha Romanoff. *NM* - 21/05/2010 06:49:55 PM 188 Views
All round good movie *spoilers* - 07/05/2010 10:04:48 PM 404 Views
I loved it. 5 stars. (spoilers within) - 08/05/2010 04:46:25 AM 374 Views
Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains. - 08/05/2010 05:21:45 AM 440 Views
This was the same villain pattern as Batman 2 - 08/05/2010 11:20:53 AM 431 Views
Batman Returns or The Dark Knight? - 08/05/2010 09:20:24 PM 395 Views
Batman Returns, clearly. - 09/05/2010 07:24:51 AM 376 Views
Hence my confusion. - 09/05/2010 05:26:28 PM 381 Views
Or Depp as Batman for that matter... - 08/05/2010 11:56:35 PM 377 Views
Re: Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains. - 09/05/2010 04:41:49 PM 423 Views
Going to see it tonight! Yay! *NM* - 08/05/2010 09:42:59 PM 192 Views
dont foget to sit through the credits... - 08/05/2010 10:26:40 PM 392 Views
But WAY at the end this time, not just half-way. *NM* - 18/05/2010 11:58:29 PM 164 Views
Friggin' Legendary. - 09/05/2010 01:23:49 AM 404 Views
The only reason I went.... - 10/05/2010 05:46:40 PM 417 Views
I liked it about as much as the first one. - 11/05/2010 03:45:03 PM 356 Views
Great movie - 24/05/2010 01:30:25 AM 340 Views

Reply to Message