Active Users:488 Time:18/09/2025 12:53:49 PM
Yeah, because Hollywood invented Vanko, Natasha, and Chekhov. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 08/05/2010 04:39:37 AM
Some examples of stupid rules:

1. Give characters South Slavic names (Serbian, Bulgarian etc.) instead of Russian ones. Whether it's Iron Man 2's Ivan Vanko or Rocky 4's Ivan Drago, neither name is Russian.

2. Give characters names by taking them from Russian writers. Dostoevsky, Chekhov (Star Trek) and Gogol (recurring James Bond KGB chief) and similar names are REALLY uncommon. It would be like Russians having all Americans in their movies named after famous Indian chiefs or something like that.

3. Give characters names that are otherwise historically important: Lenin, Romanov, Gorbachev. No one's named Lenin (it was a pseudonym) and the other two, while technically correct, are cheesy and overused.

4. Cast actors who don't even look remotely Russian (pretty much every major star in every movie).

5. Men must be evil, strong brutes bent on destroying America. Young women are hot KGB spies and old women are fat and stocky.

6. Incorrect accents are used (one of the worst - Pavel Chekhov from Star Trek).

7. They try to have the actors speak a few lines of Russian, which they usually botch so hideously Russian speakers have problems identifying what they were trying to say without reading the subtitles.

8. Russia itself rarely looks accurate (the older movies are worse in this respect, but several modern ones are pretty bad, too).

9. They don't even try in Cyrillic. In the Bourne movies at one point they show a passport where they just typed English but switched the keyboard to Cyrillic. The result is equivalent to someone typing "qwyozxc lzxcvugglnxv" for a Latin alphabet passport.
Reply to message
Iron Man 2 discussion thread - 05/05/2010 03:29:07 PM 802 Views
saw it yesterday at a friends house - 05/05/2010 04:28:33 PM 418 Views
Not amazing, but enjoyable. (no spoilers) - 06/05/2010 12:46:51 AM 453 Views
Enjoyed it, despite a few flaws, as much as the first *spoilers* - 07/05/2010 08:30:04 AM 456 Views
Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian. - 07/05/2010 06:28:12 PM 484 Views
Who cares? It's Russian. *NM* - 07/05/2010 06:45:42 PM 198 Views
Hollywood? Her character was named and introduced in Tales of Suspense in 1964. - 08/05/2010 02:18:49 AM 428 Views
Yes, I forgot about those pathetic fanboys. *NM* - 08/05/2010 04:33:10 AM 192 Views
Yeah, because Hollywood invented Vanko, Natasha, and Chekhov. *NM* - 08/05/2010 04:39:37 AM 238 Views
Re: Perpetuates Hollywood's complete idiocy with respect to anything Russian. - 21/05/2010 06:41:04 PM 410 Views
Her real name was Natasha Romanoff. *NM* - 21/05/2010 06:49:55 PM 195 Views
All round good movie *spoilers* - 07/05/2010 10:04:48 PM 422 Views
I loved it. 5 stars. (spoilers within) - 08/05/2010 04:46:25 AM 394 Views
Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains. - 08/05/2010 05:21:45 AM 459 Views
This was the same villain pattern as Batman 2 - 08/05/2010 11:20:53 AM 449 Views
Batman Returns or The Dark Knight? - 08/05/2010 09:20:24 PM 413 Views
Batman Returns, clearly. - 09/05/2010 07:24:51 AM 392 Views
Hence my confusion. - 09/05/2010 05:26:28 PM 400 Views
Or Depp as Batman for that matter... - 08/05/2010 11:56:35 PM 393 Views
Re: Stupid villains. Really, really stupid villains. - 09/05/2010 04:41:49 PM 440 Views
Going to see it tonight! Yay! *NM* - 08/05/2010 09:42:59 PM 199 Views
dont foget to sit through the credits... - 08/05/2010 10:26:40 PM 409 Views
But WAY at the end this time, not just half-way. *NM* - 18/05/2010 11:58:29 PM 171 Views
Friggin' Legendary. - 09/05/2010 01:23:49 AM 420 Views
The only reason I went.... - 10/05/2010 05:46:40 PM 433 Views
I liked it about as much as the first one. - 11/05/2010 03:45:03 PM 374 Views
Great movie - 24/05/2010 01:30:25 AM 356 Views

Reply to Message