Active Users:793 Time:02/05/2026 10:36:18 PM
Rebuttal mick Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM
Avatar is the only- ONLY- movie I've seen where the 3D was done beautifully and organically.

...

In Avatar, the picture had depth. You were looking in, instead of the picture coming out.

...


I took my 3D glasses off several times in Avatar and I didn't notice a difference (Yes, I'm sure I saw the 3D version). In Charlotte, NC there is an amusement park formerly known as Carowinds (it was sold a few years ago and I don't know if it changed names). They had a REAL 3D ride called "The 7th Portal" (or something like that). When they said 3D they MEANT it with that. These movies that are promoting 3D just have you put on glasses that hurt your eyes and they make the background just a LITTLE bit 3D. Unless there's shit flying off the screen making me duck in my seat I don't see the point of calling it 3D. I want to see a movie that makes me think I'm actually gonna get hit with debris when something gets blown to hell.


If I see a film in 3d I don't want things jumping out at me, they did that in the 80's and I find it a gratuitous way to use the effects.

I also saw the depth of every shot in Avatar as its attraction rather than adhoc crap coming at me when it suits the scene
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 1046 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 706 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 678 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 661 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 643 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 679 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 646 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 642 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 737 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 701 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 688 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 674 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 776 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 581 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 641 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 675 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 252 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 689 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 610 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 742 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 239 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 680 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 732 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 690 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 236 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 294 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 825 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 635 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 607 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 245 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 614 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 706 Views

Reply to Message