Active Users:820 Time:15/09/2026 04:30:12 PM
Re: i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 02:29:33 AM
i took my glasses off several times during the opening of avatar and either the foreground or background was out of focus without the glasses, depending on which part of the scene was being 3D'd. there was a definite difference between non-glasses and glasses during every scene in the movie.


I saw the 3D film. I took the glasses off and saw a VERY slight blur with the background, but it was nothing that would prevent me from watching the movie that way. It just looked like the background was slightly out of focus. When I put the glasses back on it just brought the background into focus. It did not make the background seem like it had more depth or anything.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 1096 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 747 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 718 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 712 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 688 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 720 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 698 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 687 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 786 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 759 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 740 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 713 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 826 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 623 Views
i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience - 06/06/2010 06:49:31 PM 795 Views
Re: i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience - 07/06/2010 02:29:33 AM 734 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 691 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 720 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 282 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 733 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 658 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 786 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 260 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 724 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 776 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 740 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 262 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 320 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 871 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 678 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 653 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 266 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 654 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 756 Views

Reply to Message