Re: ... because we never saw a male Confessor child
j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 08/06/2010 11:40:13 PM
The plotline wasn't in the books, but it was entirely consistent with the established mythology.
The fact that the male confessor child was allowed to live. That was never done in the books. The risk was considered too great to allow the child to live.
The way the TV show did it was actually quite faithful to Richard's character as they'd established it thus far. Those were two of the more interesting episodes - especially the 1st season finale.
Yeah, it was truer to his character. Too bad that situation never really came up in the SoT series.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Legend of the Seeker
- 07/06/2010 02:34:46 AM
742 Views
Did you ever watch the old Hercules or Xena shows? LotS is kind of like those.
- 07/06/2010 03:49:49 AM
640 Views
Re: Did you ever watch the old Hercules or Xena shows? LotS is kind of like those.
- 07/06/2010 05:35:41 AM
590 Views
how was that a major change?
- 07/06/2010 04:40:39 PM
541 Views
Re: how was that a major change?
- 07/06/2010 09:56:02 PM
553 Views
... because we never saw a male Confessor child
- 08/06/2010 07:29:24 PM
569 Views
Re: ... because we never saw a male Confessor child
- 08/06/2010 11:40:13 PM
572 Views