Active Users:380 Time:02/05/2025 07:04:49 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Angelina is HOT, Cleopatra was NOT imlad Send a noteboard - 16/06/2010 10:42:42 PM
Cleopatra had three things that were attractive about her: 1)she was uber-smart and willful, 2) she is generally agreed to have had large pretty eyes, and 3) she was a frakking pharoah of EGYPT and so was filthy rich!

As for being a woman of true physical beauty, well, historians will say "not so much" to that.

So, they should cast a greek woman with pretty eyes but an ugly face with a honker of a nose. But then, who would go see that?

And yeah, that's ridiculous. Of course, getting Angelina Jolie as Cleopatra is equally ridiculous.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
*Incoherent sputters of historian rage* Angelina Jolie Incorrectly Cast In New Cleopatra Role Cannoli - 11/06/2010 02:35:15 AM 906 Views
I nominate Tyra Banks. Aisha - 11/06/2010 06:29:44 AM 515 Views
I love Angelina jolie Aisha - 11/06/2010 06:36:48 AM 584 Views
Did you read his post? There's no reason for an Africanish person to play the part. *NM* Ghavrel - 11/06/2010 06:58:42 AM 188 Views
The only reason for an "Africanish" queen... lyringlas - 11/06/2010 04:09:14 PM 579 Views
why? Cleopatra was not African. *NM* LadyLorraine - 15/06/2010 10:19:11 AM 199 Views
They should get Lyndsey Marshal back, she was awesome. And looked the part. Legolas - 11/06/2010 12:45:48 PM 541 Views
The one from Rome? *NM* Cannoli - 11/06/2010 02:18:48 PM 192 Views
Yes. *NM* Legolas - 11/06/2010 02:36:20 PM 177 Views
Angelina is HOT, Cleopatra was NOT imlad - 16/06/2010 10:42:42 PM 480 Views
I'm having a hard time telling if you agree with me about Marshal or not... *NM* Legolas - 16/06/2010 11:29:02 PM 195 Views
she was too pretty in my opinion imlad - 20/06/2010 03:59:57 AM 462 Views
Purefoy was fantastic in his role. Legolas - 20/06/2010 10:42:56 AM 487 Views
Wait...is the racist part the idiocy of trying to say Cleopatra was black or the "wog" calling part? Tom - 15/06/2010 01:38:42 AM 524 Views
it's not even a proper use of the term wog. LadyLorraine - 15/06/2010 10:16:25 AM 489 Views
No, actually it is. Tom - 15/06/2010 05:06:54 PM 569 Views
mk so, looking at that neither use is "wrong". LadyLorraine - 16/06/2010 08:53:05 AM 474 Views
Hence, your statement "it's not even a proper use of the term wog" is incorrect. *NM* Tom - 16/06/2010 01:34:45 PM 174 Views
yah, i implied that i see that it is right LadyLorraine - 17/06/2010 05:10:37 AM 447 Views
And no one in the rest of the world cares about Australian slang. They're just weird down there. *NM* Tom - 16/06/2010 01:35:11 PM 190 Views
Perhaps you've confused "wog" and "wop". *NM* Tom - 15/06/2010 05:07:22 PM 191 Views
no, see above. LadyLorraine - 16/06/2010 08:54:27 AM 418 Views
Wouldn't the closest modern ethnicity to the ancient egyptians be the Coptics? *NM* imlad - 16/06/2010 10:44:39 PM 180 Views
Well, yes, or the non-Coptic Egyptians. Tom - 17/06/2010 12:57:54 AM 482 Views
I wasn't calling anyone a wog, I was suggesting a likely parallel to the Ptolemies' attitude Cannoli - 17/06/2010 09:58:23 PM 550 Views
I completely agree that the "black Cleopatra" syndrome is born of insecurities. Tom - 18/06/2010 02:11:15 AM 488 Views
Yah...i don't see why people ever think Cleopatra should be black. LadyLorraine - 15/06/2010 10:18:12 AM 470 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes