Active Users:179 Time:01/05/2024 06:19:13 AM
Depth and range of emotion are not the same. CatherineSedai Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 02:14:02 AM
She should at least be able to show what the character is feeling. Where was the wide-eyed fear hardening into resolution when she cut herself to distract Victoria? Where were any other emotional transitions? She just looks pissed all the time.

Bella is about as deep as a puddle, but she still feels. Edward has to read her face and not her mind... can he read Kristen Stewart? In Breaking Dawn (the book) Bella becomes a very dynamic character. Is Kristen going to ruin the finale of a good story that has been kicked repeatedly? Most likely. That is because SHE (not Bella) has no depth OR emotional range.
I always say, if you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips. ~Birgitte
Reply to message
Twilight Saga: Eclipse movie. Pretty good overall... - 17/07/2010 07:18:23 AM 680 Views
Did it have the complete lack of plot/cinematic quality that characterized the first movie? *NM* - 17/07/2010 08:22:05 AM 220 Views
It's Twilight, so yeah. *NM* - 17/07/2010 03:52:15 PM 234 Views
I enjoyed it! *NM* - 17/07/2010 02:19:45 PM 275 Views
Stewart is the only reason I'll ever check out the series - 17/07/2010 05:23:15 PM 559 Views
With the shades shut? *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:50:10 AM 198 Views
I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 18/07/2010 01:11:24 PM 523 Views
Re: I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 19/07/2010 04:48:44 AM 512 Views
Yeah yeah - 19/07/2010 12:16:54 PM 541 Views
Stewart plays Bella well seeing as Bella has no depth what so ever *NM* - 18/07/2010 07:15:36 PM 238 Views
Yup. *NM* - 18/07/2010 08:25:44 PM 219 Views
Depth and range of emotion are not the same. - 20/07/2010 02:14:02 AM 521 Views
*laughs* - 20/07/2010 11:26:47 AM 542 Views

Reply to Message