Active Users:1756 Time:14/09/2026 09:43:00 AM
Depth and range of emotion are not the same. CatherineSedai Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 02:14:02 AM
She should at least be able to show what the character is feeling. Where was the wide-eyed fear hardening into resolution when she cut herself to distract Victoria? Where were any other emotional transitions? She just looks pissed all the time.

Bella is about as deep as a puddle, but she still feels. Edward has to read her face and not her mind... can he read Kristen Stewart? In Breaking Dawn (the book) Bella becomes a very dynamic character. Is Kristen going to ruin the finale of a good story that has been kicked repeatedly? Most likely. That is because SHE (not Bella) has no depth OR emotional range.
I always say, if you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips. ~Birgitte
Reply to message
Twilight Saga: Eclipse movie. Pretty good overall... - 17/07/2010 07:18:23 AM 1039 Views
Did it have the complete lack of plot/cinematic quality that characterized the first movie? *NM* - 17/07/2010 08:22:05 AM 367 Views
It's Twilight, so yeah. *NM* - 17/07/2010 03:52:15 PM 386 Views
I enjoyed it! *NM* - 17/07/2010 02:19:45 PM 421 Views
Stewart is the only reason I'll ever check out the series - 17/07/2010 05:23:15 PM 860 Views
With the shades shut? *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:50:10 AM 338 Views
I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 18/07/2010 01:11:24 PM 828 Views
Re: I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 19/07/2010 04:48:44 AM 824 Views
Yeah yeah - 19/07/2010 12:16:54 PM 842 Views
Stewart plays Bella well seeing as Bella has no depth what so ever *NM* - 18/07/2010 07:15:36 PM 446 Views
Yup. *NM* - 18/07/2010 08:25:44 PM 353 Views
Depth and range of emotion are not the same. - 20/07/2010 02:14:02 AM 879 Views
*laughs* - 20/07/2010 11:26:47 AM 942 Views

Reply to Message