Active Users:357 Time:28/04/2024 11:18:44 PM
Hmmm Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM
This is a question I ask myself from time-to-time as I download TV shows and movies from various less than legal sources. The obvious answer is, "It's illegal because you're not buying the DVDs and that is screwing everyone involved in making said movie/TV show out of their fair share of the money that would be made." Or even, "It's copyright infringement pure and simple and that's what makes it illegal." Maybe I'm just trying to justify my actions, but I feel like neither of these really makes sense. Back in the days of using a VCR I would record a show on a video cassette and re-watch it many times. I would even let friends borrow the tapes and watch them if they enjoyed what I had recorded. How is that different from downloading torrents? I never bought the DVDs when I was watching TV this way. Therefore the companies responsible for the shows or movies never lost any money. Even today I can DVR an episode of TV and watch it weeks later. If I choose to I could hook a VCR up to my TV and use it to copy the DVRed program to a tape and lend that out to the four people in the world that still use their VCRs on a regular basis.


I guess because they already made money when the show aired. But they never made money from the dvds. That would be my guess. But then again you could argue that its really the retailers getting screwed but they already bought the dvds and can't sell them. So I guess Walmart is the victim here lol. Poor them
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1275 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 911 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 834 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 912 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1022 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 862 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 747 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 399 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 836 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 881 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 749 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1254 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 878 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1110 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 801 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 814 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 718 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 933 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 881 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 892 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 770 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 860 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 823 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 934 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 944 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 831 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 741 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 716 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 748 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 464 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 770 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 715 Views

Reply to Message